Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29067486›Full record

ReviewDiabetologia2017

Improving the clinical value and utility of CGM systems: issues and recommendations : A joint statement of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes and the American Diabetes Association Diabetes Technology Working Group.

John R Petrie, Anne L Peters, Richard M Bergenstal, Reinhard W Holl, G Alexander Fleming, Lutz Heinemann

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Diabetologia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
13.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Adverse Event Data for Years 2018 to 2020 for Diabetes Devices.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Making sense of glucose sensors in end-stage kidney disease: A review.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

John R PetrieInstitute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, 126 University Place, Glasgow, G12 8TA, UK. john.petrie@glasgow.ac.uk.
Anne L PetersKeck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Richard M BergenstalInternational Diabetes Center at Park Nicollet, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Reinhard W HollInstitute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, ZIBMT, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
G Alexander FlemingKinexum, Harpers Ferry, WV, USA.
Lutz HeinemannScience & Co, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Harper College · USPark Nicollet Clinic · USUniversity of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Southern California · USZimmer Biomet (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first systems for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) became available over 15 years ago. Many then believed CGM would revolutionise the use of intensive insulin therapy in diabetes; however, progress towards that vision has been gradual. Although increasing, the proportion of individuals using CGM rather than conventional systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose on a daily basis is still low in most parts of the world. Barriers to uptake include cost, measurement reliability (particularly with earlier-generation systems), human factors issues, lack of a standardised format for displaying results and uncertainty on how best to use CGM data to make therapeutic decisions. This scientific statement makes recommendations for systemic improvements in clinical use and regulatory (pre- and postmarketing) handling of CGM devices. The aim is to improve safety and efficacy in order to support the advancement of the technology in achieving its potential to improve quality of life and health outcomes for more people with diabetes.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringGlucoseHumansHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsUnited StatesBlood GlucoseGlucoseHypoglycemic AgentsInsulinAdverse eventsAmbulatory glucose profileCGMGlucoseInsulinInterstitialPosition statementSafetyTechnologyTherapyTime in range

Identifiers

PMID29067486
OpenAlexW2765734264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.