ArticleJAMA2017
Robotic-Assisted Surgery: Balancing Evidence and Implementation.
Article in JAMA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Influence of steep Trendelenburg position on postoperative complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Guideline of the Brazilian Society of Cardiology on Telemedicine in Cardiology - 2019.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2019Guideline
- Quality of life and functional outcomes after low anterior rectal resection with total mesorectal excision: a propensity score-matched comparison of robotic-assisted versus open surgery.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Article
- Patient-reported outcomes in low anterior resection syndrome: a comparison of open and robotic surgery.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
- A comparative analysis of surgical outcomes after robotic gastrectomy with conventional multiport, single-site, and single-port surgical system for gastric cancer.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2026Article
- Comparative outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic colorectal cancer surgery in the NHS: real-world evidence from sequential adoption of Versius and da Vinci Xi.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Robotic bariatric surgery reduces morbidity for revisional gastric bypass when compared to laparoscopic: outcome of 8-year MBSAQIP analysis of over 40,000 cases.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Robotic-assisted plate fixation of the anterior acetabulum - clinical description of a new technique.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Robotic Revolution in Surgery: Diverse Applications Across Specialties and Future Prospects Review Article.Cureus · 2024Review
- Prospective cohort study investigating quality of life outcomes following multi-speciality robotic-assisted surgery.Journal of minimal access surgery · 2024Article
- Patient satisfaction and quality of life outcomes following robotic-assisted surgery: A survey-based study.Bioinformation · 2024Article
- Review
- [Robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic vs. open radical cystectomy : Commentary on a systemic review and network meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Surgical Assistants.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2022Article
- Trends in Utilization and Perioperative Outcomes in Robotic-assisted Bariatric surgery using the MBSAQIP database: A 4-Year Analysis.Obesity surgery · 2021Article
- Best Practice in Surgical Treatment of Malignant Head and Neck Tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- The impact of robotic total mesorectal excision on survival of patients with rectal cancer-a propensity matched analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2019Article
- Robotic surgery trends in general surgical oncology from the National Inpatient Sample.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Article
- Early experience with the Senhance®-laparoscopic/robotic platform in the US.Journal of robotic surgery · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29067404What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.