ReviewAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)2017
Diagnostic dilemmas in Alzheimer's disease: Room for shared decision making.
Review in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Disclosure of amyloid positron emission tomography results to individuals without dementia: a systematic review.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2018Pooled it
- Extraordinary abilities, creativity, and love, in the path of dementia: a perspective article on the Walking the Talk for Dementia 2025 initiative.Frontiers in dementia · 2026Article
- Usability and feasibility of ADappt: a digital toolkit to support communication on diagnosis and prognosis in memory clinics.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2025Article
- Diagnostic information in GP referral letters to a memory clinic: a retrospective cohort study.BJGP open · 2025Article
- Amyloid PET disclosure in subjective cognitive decline: Patient experiences over time.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Article
- Relevance and Premises of Values-Based Practice for Decision Making in Brain Health.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- The expectations and experiences of patients regarding the diagnostic workup at a specialized memory clinic: An interview study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Clinician's perspectives on gene therapy for Alzheimer's disease: A qualitative study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Communication about diagnosis, prognosis, and prevention in the memory clinic: perspectives of European memory clinic professionals.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2023Article
- Shared decision-making in persons living with dementia: A scoping review.Dementia (London, England) · 2023Article
- Understanding patients' and significant others' preferences on starting a diagnostic trajectory for dementia: An integrative review.Aging & mental health · 2023Review
- Dementia prevention in memory clinics: recommendations from the European task force for brain health services.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2023Review
- Development and design of a diagnostic report to support communication in dementia: Co-creation with patients and care partners.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Article
- Dementia risk communication. A user manual for Brain Health Services-part 3 of 6.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2021Review
- Dental informed consent challenges and considerations for cognitively impaired patients.Periodontology 2000 · 2021Review
- Article
- Identifying relevant outcomes in the progression of Alzheimer's disease; what do patients and care partners want to know about prognosis?Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.) · 2021Article
- Communicating uncertainties when disclosing diagnostic test results for (Alzheimer's) dementia in the memory clinic: The ABIDE project.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020Observational
- Clinicians' communication with patients receiving a MCI diagnosis: The ABIDE project.PloS one · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The launch of the NIA-AA research criteria for Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis illustrates the large advances that have been made in the field of AD diagnosis. These new possibilities however also introduce new dilemmas into the consulting room, and this provides room for shared decision making (SDM). SDM refers to clinicians and patients (and/or their caregivers) working together to decide which care plan best fits individual patients and their lives, when there is more than one reasonable option. Here, we describe how SDM in the diagnosis of AD promotes patient-centered care, as it helps to adapt the diagnostic process to the patients' values and preferences. We provide an outline for a research agenda, as SDM in the diagnosis of dementia should be studied intensively incorporating the views of both patients and caregivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.