Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29067330›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)2017

Differential medial temporal lobe morphometric predictors of item- and relational-encoded memories in healthy individuals and in individuals with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.

Jesus J Gomar, J Daniel Ragland, Aziz M Uluğ, Amber Sousa, Edward D Huey, Concepcion Conejero-Goldberg, Peter Davies, Terry E Goldberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jesus J GomarThe Litwin-Zucker Alzheimer's Research Center, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.
J Daniel RaglandDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Aziz M UluğSusan and Leonard Feinstein Center for Neurosciences, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Amber SousaThe Litwin-Zucker Alzheimer's Research Center, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Edward D HueyTaub Institute for Research on Alzheimer's disease and the Aging Brain, The Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Concepcion Conejero-GoldbergThe Litwin-Zucker Alzheimer's Research Center, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Peter DaviesThe Litwin-Zucker Alzheimer's Research Center, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Terry E GoldbergThe Litwin-Zucker Alzheimer's Research Center, Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.
Feinstein Institute for Medical Research · USAlzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative · USCenter for Neurosciences · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

BDNF val66met Genotype and Age: Impact on Biomarkers and Exercise-based TreatmentR01AG038734 · NIA · FEINSTEIN INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI GOLDBERG, TERRY · 2011 to 2015
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG038734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionEpisodic memory processes are supported by different subregions of the medial temporal lobe (MTL). In contrast to a unitary model of memory recognition supported solely by the hippocampus, a current model suggests that item encoding engages perirhinal cortex, whereas relational encoding engages parahippocampal cortex and the hippocampus. However, this model has not been examined in the context of aging, neurodegeneration, and MTL morphometrics.

methodsForty-four healthy subjects (HSs) and 18 cognitively impaired subjects (nine mild cognitive impairment [MCI] and nine Alzheimer's disease [AD] patients) were assessed with the relational and item-specific encoding task (RISE) and underwent 3T magnetic resonance imaging. The RISE assessed the differential contribution of relational and item-specific memory. FreeSurfer was used to obtain measures of cortical thickness of MTL regions and hippocampus volume.

resultsMemory accuracies for both item and relational memory were significantly better in the HS group than in the MCI/AD group. In MCI/AD group, relational memory was disproportionately impaired. In HSs, hierarchical regressions demonstrated that memory was predicted by perirhinal thickness after item encoding, and by hippocampus volume after relational encoding (both at trend level) and significantly by parahippocampal thickness at associative recognition. The same brain morphometry profiles predicted memory accuracy in MCI/AD, although more robustly perirhinal thickness for item encoding (R DISCUSSION: Our results supported a model of episodic memory in which item-specific encoding was associated with greater perirhinal cortical thickness, while relational encoding was associated with parahippocampal thickness and hippocampus volume. We identified these relationships not only in HSs but also in individuals with MCI and AD. In the subjects with cognitive impairment, reductions in hippocampal volume and impairments in relational memory were especially prominent.

Indexed as

Alzheimer's diseaseHippocampusItem encodingMild cognitive impairmentParahippocampusPerirhinal cortexRecognition memoryRelational encoding

Identifiers

PMID29067330
PMCPMC5651447
OpenAlexW2600053529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.