ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2017
Attention is shaped by semantic level of event-structure during speech comprehension: an electroencephalogram study.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beat Gestures for Comprehension and Recall: Differential Effects of Language Learners and Native Listeners.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Effects of degree and symmetricity of bilateral spectral smearing, carrier frequency, and subject sex on amplitude of evoked auditory steady-state response signal.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2019Article
- A feature-based neurocomputational model of semantic memory.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present electroencephalogram study used an attention probe paradigm to investigate how semantic and acoustic structures constrain temporal attention during speech comprehension. Spoken sentences were used as stimuli, with each one containing a four-character critical phrase, of which the third character was the target character. We manipulated not only the semantic relationship between the target character and the immediately preceding two characters, but also the presence/absence of a pitch accent on the first character. In addition, an attention probe was either presented concurrently with the target character or not. The results showed that the N1 effect evoked by the attention probe was of larger amplitude and started earlier (enhanced attention) when the target character and the preceding two characters belonged to the same semantic event than when they spanned a semantic-event boundary, and this effect occurred only in the un-accented conditions. The results suggest that, during speech comprehension, the semantic level of event-structure can constrain attention allocation along the temporal dimension, and reverse the attention attenuation effect of prediction; meanwhile, the semantic and acoustic levels of event-structure interact with each other immediately to modulate auditory-temporal attention. The results were discussed with regard to the predictive coding account of attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.