ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2017
Porcine Models of Biofilm Infections with Focus on Pathomorphology.
Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dual transcriptomic profiling ofmBio · 2025Article
- Towards improved biofilm models.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2025Review
- Meat Inspection Decisions Regarding Pig Carcasses Affected by Osteomyelitis at the Slaughterhouse: From Etiopathogenesis to Total Condemnation Criteria.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Choosing the right animal model for osteomyelitis research: Considerations and challenges.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2023Review
- Swine Model of Biofilm Infection and Invisible Wounds.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2023Article
- The Role of Biofilms in the Pathogenesis of Animal Bacterial Infections.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Murine models of orthopedic infection featuringJournal of bone and joint infection · 2023Article
- Activity of a hypochlorous acid-producing electrochemical bandage as assessed with a porcine explant biofilm model.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2023Article
- Article
- A Journey into Animal Models of Human Osteomyelitis: A Review.Microorganisms · 2022Review
- Development of a reproducible porcine model of infected burn wounds.Journal of biological methods · 2022Article
- Antibiofilm activity of host defence peptides: complexity provides opportunities.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2021Review
- Preclinical Testing of Radiopharmaceuticals for the Detection and Characterization of Osteomyelitis: Experiences from a Porcine Model.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Strong Antimicrobial and Healing Effects of Beta-Acids from Hops in Methicillin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- In vitro and ex vivo systems at the forefront of infection modeling and drug discovery.Biomaterials · 2019Review
- Bioengineered Platforms for Chronic Wound Infection Studies: How Can We Make Them More Human-Relevant?Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Review
- Repair Process Impairment byFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019Review
- A critical review of the in vitro and in vivo models for the evaluation of anti-infective meshes.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2018Review
- Removal ofNPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial biofilm formation is one of the main reasons for a negative treatment outcome and a high recurrence rate for many chronic infections in humans. The optimal way to study both the biofilm forming bacteria and the host response simultaneously is by using discriminative, reliable, and reproducible animal models of the infections. In this review, the advantages of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.