Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29066940›Full record

ReviewSubstance abuse and rehabilitation2017

Intranasal naloxone and related strategies for opioid overdose intervention by nonmedical personnel: a review.

Christa R Lewis, Hoa T Vo, Marc Fishman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Substance abuse and rehabilitation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04589676 (Developing and Testing the Opioid Rapid Response System), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04589676 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Developing and Testing the Opioid Rapid Response System

TypeinterventionalSponsorReal Prevention, LLCRan2020 to 2021Enrolled400ConditionsOpioid OverdoseArmsNaloxone training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Article
  9. Guidance on take-home naloxone distribution and use by community overdose responders in Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Considering the Potential Benefits of Over-the-Counter Naloxone.Integrated pharmacy research & practice · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christa R LewisMaryland Treatment Centers, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Hoa T VoMaryland Treatment Centers, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Marc FishmanMaryland Treatment Centers, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Arthritis Treatment Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deaths due to prescription and illicit opioid overdose have been rising at an alarming rate, particularly in the USA. Although naloxone injection is a safe and effective treatment for opioid overdose, it is frequently unavailable in a timely manner due to legal and practical restrictions on its use by laypeople. As a result, an effort spanning decades has resulted in the development of strategies to make naloxone available for layperson or "take-home" use. This has included the development of naloxone formulations that are easier to administer for nonmedical users, such as intranasal and autoinjector intramuscular delivery systems, efforts to distribute naloxone to potentially high-impact categories of nonmedical users, as well as efforts to reduce regulatory barriers to more widespread distribution and use. Here we review the historical and current literature on the efficacy and safety of naloxone for use by nonmedical persons, provide an evidence-based discussion of the controversies regarding the safety and efficacy of different formulations of take-home naloxone, and assess the status of current efforts to increase its public distribution. Take-home naloxone is safe and effective for the treatment of opioid overdose when administered by laypeople in a community setting, shortening the time to reversal of opioid toxicity and reducing opioid-related deaths. Complementary strategies have together shown promise for increased dissemination of take-home naloxone, including 1) provision of education and training; 2) distribution to critical populations such as persons with opioid addiction, family members, and first responders; 3) reduction of prescribing barriers to access; and 4) reduction of legal recrimination fears as barriers to use. Although there has been considerable progress in decreasing the regulatory and legal barriers to effective implementation of community naloxone programs, significant barriers still exist, and much work remains to be done to integrate these programs into efforts to provide effective treatment of opioid use disorders.

Indexed as

FDA implicationsintranasal naloxonenaloxonenaloxone autoinjectornaloxone reviewNarcan Nasal Spraytake-home naloxone

Identifiers

PMID29066940
PMCPMC5644601
OpenAlexW2763042053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.