Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29066908›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2017

Establishing community-based integrated care for elderly patients through interprofessional teamwork: a qualitative analysis.

Tomohiro Asakawa, Hidenobu Kawabata, Kengo Kisa, Takayoshi Terashita, Manabu Murakami, Junji Otaki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. 'Care literacy' in super aging Japan.Open research Europe · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Leadership in interprofessional collaboration in health care.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tomohiro AsakawaDepartment of Medical Education and General Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo.
Hidenobu KawabataDepartment of Medical Education and General Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo.
Kengo KisaKutchan-Kosei General Hospital, Kutchan, Hokkaido.
Takayoshi TerashitaGraduate School of Radiological Technology Gunma Prefectural College of Health Sciences, Kamioki-machi, Maebashi, Gunma.
Manabu MurakamiInternational Relations Office, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Junji OtakiDepartment of Medical Education and General Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo.
Sapporo Medical University · JPGunma Prefectural College of Health Sciences · JPHokkaido University · JPSapporo Kosei General Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWorking in multidisciplinary teams is indispensable for ensuring high-quality care for elderly people in Japan's rapidly aging society. However, health professionals often experience difficulty collaborating in practice because of their different educational backgrounds, ideas, and the roles of each profession. In this qualitative descriptive study, we reveal how to build interdisciplinary collaboration in multidisciplinary teams.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with a total of 26 medical professionals, including physicians, nurses, public health nurses, medical social workers, and clerical personnel. Each participant worked as a team member of community-based integrated care. The central topic of the interviews was what the participants needed to establish collaboration during the care of elderly residents. Each interview lasted for about 60 minutes. All the interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and subjected to content analysis.

resultsThe analysis yielded the following three categories concerning the necessary elements of building collaboration: 1) two types of meeting configuration; 2) building good communication; and 3) effective leadership. The two meetings described in the first category - "community care meetings" and "individual care meetings" - were aimed at bringing together the disciplines and discussing individual cases, respectively. Building good communication referred to the activities that help professionals understand each other's ideas and roles within community-based integrated care. Effective leadership referred to the presence of two distinctive human resources that could coordinate disciplines and move the team forward to achieve goals.

conclusionTaken together, our results indicate that these three factors are important for establishing collaborative medical teams according to health professionals. Regular meetings and good communication facilitated by effective leadership can promote collaborative practice and mutual understanding between various professions.

Indexed as

geriatric health servicesintegrated primary and community careinterdisciplinary communicationinterprofessional educationJapanmultidisciplinary collaborationqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID29066908
PMCPMC5644561
OpenAlexW2763062183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.