Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29066760›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Simulating Moral Actions: An Investigation of Personal Force in Virtual Moral Dilemmas.

K B Francis, S Terbeck, R A Briazu, A Haines, M Gummerum, G Ganis, I S Howard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Moral Judgment as Categorization (MJAC).Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K B FrancisUniversity of Reading, Department of Philosophy, Whiteknights Campus, Reading, RG6 6AA, United Kingdom. kathrynbfrancis@googlemail.com.
S TerbeckUniversity of Plymouth, School of Psychology, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, United Kingdom.
R A BriazuUniversity of Plymouth, School of Psychology, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, United Kingdom.
A HainesUniversity of Plymouth, Transtechnology Research, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, United Kingdom.
M GummerumUniversity of Plymouth, School of Psychology, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, United Kingdom.
G GanisUniversity of Plymouth, School of Psychology, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6175-2618
I S HowardUniversity of Plymouth, Centre for Robotics and Neural Systems, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6041-9669
University of Plymouth · GBUniversity of Reading · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in Virtual Reality (VR) technologies allow the investigation of simulated moral actions in visually immersive environments. Using a robotic manipulandum and an interactive sculpture, we now also incorporate realistic haptic feedback into virtual moral simulations. In two experiments, we found that participants responded with greater utilitarian actions in virtual and haptic environments when compared to traditional questionnaire assessments of moral judgments. In experiment one, when incorporating a robotic manipulandum, we found that the physical power of simulated utilitarian responses (calculated as the product of force and speed) was predicted by individual levels of psychopathy. In experiment two, which integrated an interactive and life-like sculpture of a human into a VR simulation, greater utilitarian actions continued to be observed. Together, these results support a disparity between simulated moral action and moral judgment. Overall this research combines state-of-the-art virtual reality, robotic movement simulations, and realistic human sculptures, to enhance moral paradigms that are often contextually impoverished. As such, this combination provides a better assessment of simulated moral action, and illustrates the embodied nature of morally-relevant actions.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalMoralsAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansJudgmentMalePersonalitySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29066760
PMCPMC5654774
OpenAlexW2765100987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.