Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29066534›Full record

ArticleBone & joint research2017

The effect of long-term bisphosphonate therapy on trabecular bone strength and microcrack density.

A Jin, J Cobb, U Hansen, R Bhattacharya, C Reinhard, N Vo, R Atwood, J Li, A Karunaratne, C Wiles and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Minodronate for the treatment of osteoporosis.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A JinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
J CobbImperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, London W6 8RF, UK.
U HansenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
R BhattacharyaMusculoskeletal Sciences, Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, 7L21, East Lab Block MSk Lab, Margravine Road, London W6 8RP, UK.
C ReinhardDiamond Light Source Ltd, Fermi Avenue, Didcot OX11 0DE, Oxfordshire, UK.
N VoDiamond Light Source Ltd, Fermi Avenue, Didcot OX11 0DE, Oxfordshire, UK.
R AtwoodDiamond Light Source Ltd, Fermi Avenue, Didcot OX11 0DE, Oxfordshire, UK.
J LiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
A KarunaratneBioengineering, Imperial College London, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
C WilesMusculoskeletal Sciences, Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, 7L21, East Lab Block MSk Lab, Margravine Road, London W6 8RP, UK.
R AbelMusculoskeletal Sciences, Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, 7L21, East Lab Block MSk Lab, Margravine Road, London W6 8RP, UK richard.abel@imperial.ac.uk.
Imperial College London · GBDiamond Light Source · GBCharing Cross Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBisphosphonates (BP) are the first-line treatment for preventing fragility fractures. However, concern regarding their efficacy is growing because bisphosphonate is associated with over-suppression of remodelling and accumulation of microcracks. While dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanning may show a gain in bone density, the impact of this class of drug on mechanical properties remains unclear. We therefore sought to quantify the mechanical strength of bone treated with BP (oral alendronate), and correlate data with the microarchitecture and density of microcracks in comparison with untreated controls.

methodsTrabecular bone from hip fracture patients treated with BP (n = 10) was compared with naïve fractured (n = 14) and non-fractured controls (n = 6). Trabecular cores were synchrotron scanned and micro-CT scanned for microstructural analysis, including quantification of bone volume fraction, microarchitecture and microcracks. The specimens were then mechanically tested in compression.

resultsBP bone was 28% lower in strength than untreated hip fracture bone, and 48% lower in strength than non-fractured control bone (4.6 MPa

conclusionBP therapy had no detectable mechanical benefit in the specimens examined. Instead, its use was associated with substantially reduced bone strength. This low strength may be due to the greater accumulation of microcracks and a lack of any discernible improvement in bone volume or microarchitecture. This preliminary study suggests that the clinical impact of BP-induced microcrack accumulation may be significant.

Indexed as

AgeingAntiresorptivesBiomechanicsOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID29066534
PMCPMC5670367
OpenAlexW2765277891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.