Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29066421›Full record

ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2017

Caregiver Input to Optimize the Design of a Pediatric Care Planning Guide for Rehabilitation: Descriptive Study.

Mary A Khetani, Heather K Lim, Marya E Corden

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Family-centred care interventions for children with chronic conditions: A scoping review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Participation-Focused Strategy Use Among Caregivers of Children Receiving Early Intervention.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association
    Article
  14. Usability of the Participation and Environment Measure Plus (PEM+) for Client-Centered and Participation-Focused Care Planning.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mary A KhetaniChildren's Participation in Environment Research Lab, Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2628-3371
Heather K LimChildren's Participation in Environment Research Lab, Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4145-6333
Marya E CordenChildren's Participation in Environment Research Lab, Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8199-004X

Funding

MULTICENTER CAREER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR PHYSICAL AND OCCUPATIONAL THERAPYK12HD055931 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HAYES, MARCIE HARRIS · 2007 to 2021
$12.7M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD055931
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCaregiver input has informed the design of a valid electronic patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure for use in pediatric rehabilitation. This proxy assessment may be further developed to expedite and enhance patient-centered care planning processes, but user input is first needed to finalize the core requirements that will guide its design.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to examine the feasibility of a stepwise process for building on a baseline assessment of young children's participation in activities to develop a care plan relevant to pediatric rehabilitation.

methodsA cross-sectional descriptive study design was employed using qualitative methods. Data were collected via Web-based technology and by telephone. Twenty-five caregivers of young children (9 with developmental delays, 16 without delays) and between 1 and 7 years were recruited from a subsample of parents who had previously enrolled in a Web-based validation of a PRO on children's participation and provided consent for future contact. Each caregiver completed a demographic questionnaire and Young Children's Participation and Environment Measure (YC-PEM) online, followed by a 20- to 60-min semistructured and audiotaped phone interview to review and build upon PRO results as summarized in an electronic report. Interview data were content coded to the interview guide and reviewed by multiple research staff to estimate feasibility according to stepwise completion rates, perceptions of difficulty in step completion, and perceptions of overall utility.

resultsHalf of the participants in the final study sample (N=25) fully completed a stepwise process of building on their baseline PRO assessment to develop an initial care plan for their child. In most cases, similar stepwise completion rates and trends in the approaches taken for step completion were found regardless of the child's disability status. However, more parents of children with disabilities reported difficulties in rank ordering their priorities for change and identified child-focused strategies for goal attainment. Nearly 77% (19/25) of users were willing to use the process to develop and communicate intervention priorities and strategies with professionals, family, and friends.

conclusionsResults informed revisions to the care planning guide before usability and feasibility testing of an initial Web-based prototype that is now underway.

Indexed as

eHealthgoalspatient-reported outcomepediatricssocial participation

Identifiers

PMID29066421
PMCPMC5676028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.