Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29065863›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2017

Obesity and socioeconomic disadvantage in midlife female public sector employees: a cohort study.

Aapo Hiilamo, Tea Lallukka, Minna Mänty, Anne Kouvonen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Obesity, Employment, and Economic Productivity in Europe: A Systematic Literature Review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Inequalities in Exclusively Mobile Interventions Targeting Weight-Related Behaviors: Systematic Review of Observational Studies.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pollution, stress response, and obesity: A systematic review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Socioeconomics of Obesity.Current obesity reports · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Social Determinants of Placental Health and Future Disease Risks for Babies.Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aapo HiilamoDepartment of Social Research, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Tea LallukkaDepartment of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Minna MäntyDepartment of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Anne KouvonenDepartment of Social Research, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. a.kouvonen@qub.ac.uk.
University of Helsinki · FILaurea University of Applied Sciences · FI

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K023241/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe two-way relationship between obesity and socioeconomic disadvantage is well established but previous studies on social and economic consequences of obesity have primarily focused on relatively young study populations. We examined whether obesity is associated with socioeconomic disadvantage through the 10-12-year follow-up, and how obesity-related socioeconomic inequalities develop during midlife among women.

methodsBaseline data were derived from the female population of the Helsinki Health Study cohort, comprising 40-60 -year-old employees of the City of Helsinki, Finland in 2000-2002 (n = 6913, response rate 69%). The follow-up surveys were carried out in 2007 (n = 5810) and 2012 (n = 5400). Socioeconomic disadvantage was measured by five dichotomous measures. Repeated logistic regression analyses utilising generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to test the association between baseline self-reported obesity and the likelihood of socioeconomic disadvantage through all phases. The effect of time on the development of inequalities was examined by time interaction terms in random effect logistic regression models.

resultsAfter adjustment for educational level, baseline obesity was associated with repeated poverty (OR = 1.23; 95% CI; 1.05-1.44), frequent economic difficulties (OR = 1.74; 95% CI; 1.52-1.99), low household net income (OR = 1.23; 95% CI; 1.07-1.41), low household wealth (OR = 1.90; 95% CI; 1.59-2.26) and low personal income (OR = 1.22; 95% CI; 1.03-1.44). The differences in poverty rate and low personal income between the participants with obesity and participants with normal weight widened during the follow-up. Living without a partner and early exit from paid employment explained the widening of inequalities.

conclusionsWeight status inequalities in socioeconomic disadvantage persisted or widened during the late adulthood.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesPublic SectorAdultEmploymentFemaleFinlandFollow-Up StudiesHumansLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedObesityPovertySocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesLongitudinal studiesMidlifeObesityOlder workersPovertySocial inequalitiesSocioeconomic disadvantage

Identifiers

PMID29065863
PMCPMC5655943
OpenAlexW2765984108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.