Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29065497›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2017

Barriers and Facilitators to the Elimination of Asbestos Related Diseases-Stakeholders' Perspectives.

Joanne Vincenten, Frank George, Marco Martuzzi, Peter Schröder-Bäck, Elizabet Paunovic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Asbestos Poverty as a New Paradigm for Multidimensional Urban Sustainability.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joanne VincentenFaculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, School CAPHRI-Care and Public Health Research Institute, Department of International Health, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. joanne.vincenten@gmail.com.
Frank GeorgeWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, the European Centre for Environment and Health, Bonn D-53113, Germany. georgef@who.int.
Marco MartuzziWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, the European Centre for Environment and Health, Bonn D-53113, Germany. martuzzim@who.int.
Peter Schröder-BäckFaculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, School CAPHRI-Care and Public Health Research Institute, Department of International Health, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. peter.schroder@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Elizabet PaunovicWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, the European Centre for Environment and Health, Bonn D-53113, Germany. paunovice@who.int.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite sound scientific knowledge and evidence that any exposure to asbestos fibers in all of its forms, are carcinogenic to humans, its presence, use and trade is still substantial, including in the World Health Organization (WHO) European Region. Banning the production and use of all forms of asbestos, as recommended by the International Labour Organization (ILO) and WHO, has been proven as the most efficient evidence-based strategy to eliminate Asbestos Related Diseases (ARDs). To effectively move elimination of ARDs forward, attaining a greater understanding of key stakeholders perspectives was identified as an important action. The WHO Regional Office for Europe, the European Centre for Environment and Health, undertook semi-structured interviews, and follow-up discussions with diverse representatives dealing professionally with asbestos. The interview questionnaire was developed based on the current ARDs WHO Report, the Evidence Implementation Model for Public Health and categories of the theory of diffusion. Data were attained on three main questions within the interview questionnaire: (1) Identifying barriers to implementation of WHO evidence-based asbestos recommendations; (2) Describing roles of key stakeholders; and, (3) Proposing possible solutions. The results demonstrated use of sound and convincing scientific evidence along with economic evidence and facilitators can be used to achieve evidence-based policy development, and comprehensive diverse actions.

Indexed as

AsbestosCarcinogensEuropeHumansLung DiseasesSurveys and QuestionnairesWorld Health OrganizationAsbestosCarcinogensasbestosbarriersevidence implementationfacilitators

Identifiers

PMID29065497
PMCPMC5664770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.