Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29065440›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastroenterology and hepatology2018

Individual and combined effects of hepatitis B surface antigen level and viral load on liver cancer risk.

Yang Yang, Jing Gao, Yu-Ting Tan, Hong-Lan Li, Jing Wang, Xiao Ma, Wei Zheng, Xiao-Ou Shu, Yong-Bing Xiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [Rethinking the natural history staging for chronic hepatitis B virus infection].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2024
    Article
  3. RETRACTED: Menstrual Factors, Reproductive History and Liver Cancer Risk: Findings from a Prospective Cohort Study in Chinese Women.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Yang YangState Key Laboratory of Oncogene and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jing GaoState Key Laboratory of Oncogene and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yu-Ting TanState Key Laboratory of Oncogene and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Hong-Lan LiState Key Laboratory of Oncogene and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jing WangState Key Laboratory of Oncogene and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xiao MaState Key Laboratory of Oncogene and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wei ZhengDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt University Medicine Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Xiao-Ou ShuDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt University Medicine Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Yong-Bing XiangState Key Laboratory of Oncogene and Related Genes, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Cancer Institute · CNState Key Laboratory of Oncogene and Related Genes · CNRenji Hospital · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNVanderbilt Health · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Translational Analysis CoreP30DK058404 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI RICHARD M. PEEK · 2002 to 2026
$29.9M
Cohort Study of Cancer inhibitory Factors in MenR01CA082729 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SHU, XIAO-OU · 2001 to 2011
$6.3M
Shanghai Womens Health StudyUM1CA182910 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZHENG, WEI · 2014 to 2018
$5.9M
Shanghai Men's Health StudyUM1CA173640 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI SHU, XIAO-OU · 2013 to 2017
$4.9M
Cancer Risk Reduction and Diet: A Cohort Study of WomenR37CA070867 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZHENG, WEI · 2009 to 2013
$4.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA082729NCI NIH HHS R37 CA070867NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA173640NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA182910NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK058404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and viral load are both hallmarks of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and have potential to stratify liver cancer risk.

methodsWe carried out a nested case-control study including 211 liver cancer cases and 221 controls who were seropositive for HBsAg within two population-based cohorts in Shanghai. Logistic regression was performed to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

resultsRisk of liver cancer was positively related to increasing levels of HBV-DNA and HBsAg in dose-response manners. Compared with subjects with HBV-DNA < 2000 IU/ml, the adjusted ORs increased from 2.11 (95%CI: 0.99-4.50) to 10.47 (95%CI: 5.06-21.68) for those with HBV-DNA level at 2000-19 999 to ≥ 20 000 IU/ml. Compared with subjects at a low level of HBsAg (0.05-99 IU/ml), the adjusted ORs increased from 1.82 (95%CI: 0.90-3.68) to 2.21 (95%CI: 1.10-4.43) for those with HBsAg level at 100-999 to ≥ 1000 IU/ml. Compared with subjects with HBV-DNA < 2000 IU/ml and HBsAg < 100 IU/ml, the adjusted ORs were increased from 2.20 (95%CI: 1.07-4.49) for those with HBV-DNA < 2000 and HBsAg ≥ 100 IU/ml to 6.94 (95%CI: 3.39-14.23) for those with HBV-DNA ≥ 2000 IU/ml and HBsAg < 1000 IU/ml, and 16.15 (95%CI: 7.60-34.32) for those with HBV-DNA ≥ 2000 IU/ml and HBsAg ≥ 1000 IU/ml.

conclusionElevated levels of HBV-DNA and HBsAg are associated with increased risks of liver cancer. Chronic HBsAg carriers may be suggested to simultaneously lower the viral load to < 2000 IU/ml and HBsAg level to < 100 IU/ml to lower their liver cancer risk.

Indexed as

Viral LoadAgedBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesDNA, ViralFemaleHepatitis BHepatitis B Surface AntigensHepatitis B virusHumansLiver NeoplasmsLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedRiskBiomarkersDNA, ViralHepatitis B Surface Antigenshepatitis B surface antigenhepatitis B virusliver cancerprospective studyviral load

Identifiers

PMID29065440
PMCPMC5902426
OpenAlexW2765102798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.