Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29065406›Full record

ArticleBrain, behavior and evolution2017

Midsagittal Brain Variation among Non-Human Primates: Insights into Evolutionary Expansion of the Human Precuneus.

Ana Sofia Pereira-Pedro, James K Rilling, Xu Chen, Todd M Preuss, Emiliano Bruner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain, behavior and evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Frontal sinuses and human evolution.Science advances · 2022
    Article
  3. Brain Functional Connectivity Changes in Patients with Acute Eye Pain: A Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Sofia Pereira-PedroGrupo de Paleoneurología, Centro Nacional de Investigación sobre la Evolución Humana, Burgos, Spain.
James K Rilling
Xu Chen
Todd M Preuss
Emiliano Bruner
National Research Center on Human Evolution · ESCenter for Neurosciences · USMuseum of Indian Arts and Culture · US

Funding

Yerkes National Primate Research Center Role of type-I IFN in regulating COVID-19 induced inflammation and pathogenesisP51OD011132 · OD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Joon Sup Lee · 2012 to 2026
$167.0M
SOCIAL COGNITION AND EMOTIONAL AGING IN PRIMATESP01AG026423 · NIA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI HERNDON, JAMES G · 2007 to 2011
$11.6M
A National Chimpanzee Brain ResourceR24NS092988 · NINDS · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SHERWOOD, CHESTER · 2015 to 2018
$969k
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG026423NIH HHS P51 OD011132NINDS NIH HHS R24 NS092988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The precuneus is a major element of the superior parietal lobule, positioned on the medial side of the hemisphere and reaching the dorsal surface of the brain. It is a crucial functional region for visuospatial integration, visual imagery, and body coordination. Previously, we argued that the precuneus expanded in recent human evolution, based on a combination of paleontological, comparative, and intraspecific evidence from fossil and modern human endocasts as well as from human and chimpanzee brains. The longitudinal proportions of this region are a major source of anatomical variation among adult humans and, being much larger in Homo sapiens, is the main characteristic differentiating human midsagittal brain morphology from that of our closest living primate relative, the chimpanzee. In the current shape analysis, we examine precuneus variation in non-human primates through landmark-based models, to evaluate the general pattern of variability in non-human primates, and to test whether precuneus proportions are influenced by allometric effects of brain size. Results show that precuneus proportions do not covary with brain size, and that the main difference between monkeys and apes involves a vertical expansion of the frontal and occipital regions in apes. Such differences might reflect differences in brain proportions or differences in cranial architecture. In this sample, precuneus variation is apparently not influenced by phylogenetic or allometric factors, but does vary consistently within species, at least in chimpanzees and macaques. This result further supports the hypothesis that precuneus expansion in modern humans is not merely a consequence of increasing brain size or of allometric scaling, but rather represents a species-specific morphological change in our lineage.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological EvolutionBrainFossilsHominidaeHumansMacacaOrgan SizePan troglodytesParietal LobePhylogenyPrimatesSkullSpecies SpecificityApesBrain morphologyGeometric morphometricsMacaquesPrecuneus

Identifiers

PMID29065406
PMCPMC5687995
OpenAlexW2766544356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.