Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29065200›Full record

ReviewNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2018

Basic Science and Public Policy: Informed Regulation for Nicotine and Tobacco Products.

Christie D Fowler, Cassandra D Gipson, Bethea A Kleykamp, Laura E Rupprecht, Paul T Harrell, Vaughan W Rees, Thomas J Gould, Jason Oliver, Deniz Bagdas, M Imad Damaj and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Adult Consequences of Repeated Nicotine Vapor Inhalation in Adolescent Rats.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Christie D FowlerDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA.
Cassandra D GipsonDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
Bethea A KleykampPinneyAssociates, Bethesda, MD.
Laura E RupprechtCenter for Neuroscience at the University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Paul T HarrellDivision of Community Health & Research, Department of Pediatrics, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA.
Vaughan W ReesCenter for Global Tobacco Control, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Thomas J GouldDepartment of Biobehavioral Health, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
Jason OliverDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Deniz BagdasDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
M Imad DamajDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
Heath D SchmidtDepartment of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Alexander DuncanDepartment of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Mariella De BiasiDepartment of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Basic Science Network (BSN) of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT)

Funding

Circulating miRNAs and Epigenetic Regulation in Nicotine AddictionDP1DA039658 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI FOWLER, CHRISTIE D · 2015 to 2019
$2.3M
Genes and molecular pathways in nicotine dependence and withdrawalR01DA032246 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI DAMAJ, M. IMAD, MILES, MICHAEL F · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
Nicotine Withdrawal and Reward Processing: Connecting Neurobiology toReal-World BehaviorK23DA042898 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI OLIVER, JASON ANTHONY · 2017 to 2021
$855k
The Habenulo-Interpeduncular Pathway and NicotineR00DA032543 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI FOWLER, CHRISTIE D · 2014 to 2016
$741k
Measure Development for Prediction of E-cigarette InitiationR03CA195124 · NCI · EASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI HARRELL, PAUL TRUMAN · 2015 to 2016
$166k
NCI NIH HHS R03 CA195124NIDA NIH HHS DP1 DA039658NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA042898NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA032543NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA032246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Scientific discoveries over the past few decades have provided significant insight into the abuse liability and negative health consequences associated with tobacco and nicotine-containing products. While many of these advances have led to the development of policies and laws that regulate access to and formulations of these products, further research is critical to guide future regulatory efforts, especially as novel nicotine-containing products are introduced and selectively marketed to vulnerable populations. Discussion: In this narrative review, we provide an overview of the scientific findings that have impacted regulatory policy and discuss considerations for further translation of science into policy decisions. We propose that open, bidirectional communication between scientists and policy makers is essential to develop transformative preventive- and intervention-focused policies and programs to reduce appeal, abuse liability, and toxicity of the products. Conclusions: Through these types of interactions, collaborative efforts to inform and modify policy have the potential to significantly decrease the use of tobacco and alternative nicotine products and thus enhance health outcomes for individuals. Implications: This work addresses current topics in the nicotine and tobacco research field to emphasize the importance of basic science research and provide examples of how it can be utilized to inform public policy. In addition to relaying current thoughts on the topic from experts in the field, the article encourages continued efforts and communication between basic scientists and policy officials.

Indexed as

NicotineBiomedical ResearchHumansPublic PolicyTobacco ProductsTobacco Use DisorderNicotine

Identifiers

PMID29065200
PMCPMC5991436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.