Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29065111›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2018

Identification of a specific peptide binding to colon cancer cells from a phage-displayed peptide library.

Lidan Hou, Danxi Zhu, Yu Liang, Xiaohui Tian, Lei Li, Ping Wang, Liming Zhu, Xiaoling Weng, Yingying Wang, Yue Li and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Application of Phage-Displayed Peptides in Tumor Imaging Diagnosis and Targeting Therapy.International journal of peptide research and therapeutics · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Biopanning data bank 2018: hugging next generation phage display.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lidan HouDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China.
Danxi ZhuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China.
Yu LiangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China.
Xiaohui TianDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai 200060, China.
Lei LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China.
Ping WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China.
Liming ZhuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China.
Xiaoling WengCancer institute, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Yingying WangDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular and Cell Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Yue LiPathology Center, Shanghai First People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200082, China.
Tianqi WuCancer institute, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Jianhua WangCancer institute, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Xiangjun MengDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200011, China.
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital · CNFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNShanghai First People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew molecular probes are essential for early colon cancer diagnosis. A phage-display screening was performed to select novel binding peptides for early colon cancer imaging detection.

methodsA human colon cancer cell line (COLO320HSR) and a normal human intestinal epithelial cell line (NCM460) were used for subtractive screening with a phage peptide library. The positive peptides were identified, and their binding capacities were confirmed by confocal immunofluorescence both in human colon cancer cells and in biopsy specimens. The sequences were further analysed for homology and the existing mimotopes by the BLAST algorithm and the MimoDB database.

resultsA peptide termed as CBP-DWS, which was demonstrated to be capable of binding to a panel of human colon cancer cell lines and tissues, was identified; it had virtually no binding to normal human intestinal epithelial cell line NCM460 and normal surrounding colon tissues. Bioinformatics analyses suggest that CBP-DWS targets human Glypican-3, which may be involved in important cellular functions in multiple cancer types.

conclusionsThese studies suggest that the selected peptide CBP-DWS may be a candidate to serve as a novel probe for colon cancer imaging.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCell Line, TumorColonic NeoplasmsComputational BiologyGlypicansHCT116 CellsHT29 CellsHumansMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, FluorescenceMolecular ImagingPeptide LibraryPeptidesProtein BindingSequence Homology, Nucleic AcidGlypicansGPC3 protein, humanPeptide LibraryPeptides

Identifiers

PMID29065111
PMCPMC5765222
OpenAlexW2765974009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.