ArticleJournal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation2017
Prototype tests of vertical and torsional alignment nulling for screening vestibular function.
Article in Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Asymmetry between Perceptual, Ocular, and Postural Vestibular Screening Tests.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Selected discoveries from human research in space that are relevant to human health on Earth.NPJ microgravity · 2020Review
- A review on screening tests for vestibular disorders.Journal of neurophysiology · 2019Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe have developed a non-invasive, behavioral measure of ocular alignment using a computer tablet, colored lenses, and touch screen software.
objectiveThe goal of this study was to determine if these tests differentiate healthy controls from patients with vestibular disorders.
methodsIn the vertical alignment nulling test (VAN), subjects were asked to adjust a horizontal line that was offset vertically from a fixed horizontal line. In the torsional alignment nulling test (TAN) subjects were asked to adjust a line that was rotationally offset (i.e. clockwise) from a fixed horizontal line. We measured VAN and TAN in 14 healthy controls and 8 patients with known vestibular disorders.
resultsPatients had significantly worse scores than controls on TAN, (mean 2.2 vs 0.75, p = 0.01), and no differences for scores compared to controls on VAN, (mean 0.4 vs 0.8, p = 0.07).
conclusionsThese results suggest that TAN, and possibly VAN, have potential for identifying misalignments in ocular position. After further technical development these tests might be useful in the future for screening patients in facilities that are not equipped to perform cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.