Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29064602›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2018

Brain stimulation-induced neuroplasticity underlying therapeutic response in phantom sounds.

Timm B Poeppl, Berthold Langguth, Astrid Lehner, Thomas Frodl, Rainer Rupprecht, Peter M Kreuzer, Michael Landgrebe, Martin Schecklmann

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review and Perspective on Brain Bases of Tinnitus.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Non-Invasive Neuromodulation for Tinnitus.Journal of audiology & otology · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Timm B PoepplDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5992-5695
Berthold LangguthDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Astrid LehnerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Thomas FrodlDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Rainer RupprechtDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Peter M KreuzerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Michael LandgrebeDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Martin SchecklmannDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6208-7821
University of Regensburg · DEKrankenhaus Agatharied · DEOtto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noninvasive brain stimulation can modify phantom sounds for longer periods by modulating neural activity and putatively inducing regional neuroplastic changes. However, treatment response is limited and there are no good demographic or clinical predictors for treatment outcome. We used state-of-the-art voxel-based morphometry (VBM) to investigate whether transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced neuroplasticity determines therapeutic outcome. Sixty subjects chronically experiencing phantom sounds (i.e., tinnitus) received repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of left dorsolateral prefrontal and temporal cortex according to a protocol that has been shown to yield a significantly higher number of treatment responders than sham stimulation and previous stimulation protocols. Structural magnetic resonance imaging was performed before and after rTMS. In VBM whole-brain analyses (P < 0.05, FWE corrected), we assessed longitudinal gray matter changes as well as structural connectivity between the ensuing regions. We observed longitudinal mesoscopic gray matter changes of left dorsolateral prefontal (DLPFC), left operculo-insular, and right inferior temporal cortex (ITC) in responders (N = 22) but not nonresponders (N = 38), as indicated by a group × time interaction and post-hoc tests. These results were neither influenced by age, sex, hearing loss nor by tinnitus laterality, duration, and severity at baseline. Furthermore, we found robust DLPFC-insula and insula-ITC connectivity in responders, while only relatively weak DLPFC-insula connectivity and no insula-ITC connectivity could be demonstrated in nonresponders. Our results reinforce the implication of nonauditory brain regions in phantom sounds and suggest the dependence of therapeutic response on their neuroplastic capabilities. The latter in turn may depend on (differences in) their individual structural connectivity. Hum Brain Mapp 39:554-562, 2018. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Neuronal PlasticityTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAuditory PerceptionBrainFemaleGray MatterHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNeural PathwaysTinnitusTreatment Outcomemagnetic resonance imagingphantom soundstinnitustranscranial magnetic stimulationvoxel-based morphometry

Identifiers

PMID29064602
PMCPMC6866612
OpenAlexW2767095611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.