Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29064368›Full record

ArticleeLife2017

AMPylation targets the rate-limiting step of BiP's ATPase cycle for its functional inactivation.

Steffen Preissler, Lukas Rohland, Yahui Yan, Ruming Chen, Randy J Read, David Ron

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Inhibition of FicD-mediated AMPylation and deAMPylation by isoprenoid diphosphates.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. AMPylation: key roles in biological regulation across prokaryotes and eukaryotes.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. The functional dynamics of FicD's TPR domain are modulated by the interaction with ATP and BiP.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. AMPylation and Endoplasmic Reticulum Protein Folding Homeostasis.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2023
    Review
  17. The Alarmone Diadenosine Tetraphosphate as a Cosubstrate for Protein AMPylation.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2023
    Article
  18. Fic-mediated AMPylation tempers the unfolded protein response during physiological stress.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steffen PreisslerCambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7936-9836
Lukas RohlandCambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1559-5097
Yahui YanCambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6934-9874
Ruming ChenCambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Randy J ReadCambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8273-0047
David RonCambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3014-5636
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/12/41/29679Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 082961/Z/07/ZWellcome Trust 100140Wellcome Trust 200848/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-localized Hsp70 chaperone BiP contributes to protein folding homeostasis by engaging unfolded client proteins in a process that is tightly coupled to ATP binding and hydrolysis. The inverse correlation between BiP AMPylation and the burden of unfolded ER proteins suggests a post-translational mechanism for adjusting BiP's activity to changing levels of ER stress, but the underlying molecular details are unexplored. We present biochemical and crystallographic studies indicating that irrespective of the identity of the bound nucleotide AMPylation biases BiP towards a conformation normally attained by the ATP-bound chaperone. AMPylation does not affect the interaction between BiP and J-protein co-factors but appears to allosterically impair J protein-stimulated ATP-hydrolysis, resulting in the inability of modified BiP to attain high affinity for its substrates. These findings suggest a molecular mechanism by which AMPylation serves as a switch to inactivate BiP, limiting its interactions with substrates whilst conserving ATP.

Indexed as

Protein Processing, Post-TranslationalAdenosine MonophosphateAdenosine TriphosphatasesAdenosine TriphosphateAnimalsCricetinaeCrystallography, X-RayEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPHeat-Shock ProteinsHydrolysisModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein ConformationAdenosine MonophosphateAdenosine TriphosphatasesAdenosine TriphosphateEndoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone BiPHeat-Shock ProteinsAMPylationbiochemistrybiophysicsBiPendoplasmic reticulumHsp70J-proteinsnonestructural biology

Identifiers

PMID29064368
PMCPMC5667935
OpenAlexW2765949138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.