Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29064061›Full record

ArticleMycopathologia2018

Molecular Characterization and Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Sequentially Obtained Clinical Cryptococcus deneoformans and Cryptococcus neoformans Isolates from Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Rok Tomazin, Tadeja Matos, Jacques F Meis, Ferry Hagen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycopathologia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Molecular epidemiology and distribution ofThe Journal of international medical research · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Antifungal Resistance in Cryptococcal Infections.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Cryptococcosis and Cryptococcus.Mycopathologia · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Species Distinction in the Trichophyton rubrum Complex.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rok TomazinInstitute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Zaloška 4, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6379-9516
Tadeja MatosInstitute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Zaloška 4, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. tadeja.matos@mf.uni-lj.si.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5696-1412
Jacques F MeisDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3253-6080
Ferry HagenDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5622-1916

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo retrospectively investigate the epidemiology of cryptococcosis in Ljubljana, Slovenia. METHODOLOGY: Forty-six sequentially obtained isolates from 19 patients were subjected to amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) genotyping, microsatellite typing, mating- and serotype PCRs and antifungal susceptibility testing.

resultsMajority of the isolates were Cryptococcus deneoformans (n = 29/46; 63%) followed by Cryptococcus neoformans (n = 16/46; 34.8%) and their interspecies hybrid (n = 1/46; 2.2%). Mating-type α was predominant, two mating-type a C. deneoformans isolates and one mating-type a/α isolate were observed. Several mixed infections were found by microsatellite typing; one patient had a persisting C. deneoformans infection for > 2.5 years. For C. deneoformans, the in vitro antifungal MIC

conclusionsMajority of the cases were caused by C. deneoformans; mating-type α was predominant. Several mixed infections were identified by AFLP genotyping and microsatellite typing. Despite antifungal therapy, a cryptococcal isolate could persist for years. Voriconazole, itraconazole and posaconazole were the most potent antifungal drugs.

Indexed as

GenotypeMolecular TypingMycological Typing TechniquesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCoinfectionCryptococcosisCryptococcusDrug Resistance, FungalFemaleGenes, Mating Type, FungalHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAFLP genotypingCryptococcosisCryptococcus deneoformansCryptococcus neoformansEpidemiologyMicrosatellite typing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.