ArticleBrain imaging and behavior2018
Stability of MRI metrics in the advanced research core of the NCAA-DoD concussion assessment, research and education (CARE) consortium.
Article in Brain imaging and behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating Transferability of ComBat Harmonization of Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Article
- Harmonization of diffusion MRI on healthy subjects using NeuroCombat and LongCombat: a B-Q MINDED brain intra- and inter-scanner study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Article
- Longitudinal Associations Between Blood Biomarkers and White Matter MRI in Sport-Related Concussion: A Study of the NCAA-DoD CARE Consortium.Neurology · 2023Article
- Effects of White-Matter Tract Length in Sport-Related Concussion: A Tractography Study from the NCAA-DoD CARE Consortium.Journal of neurotrauma · 2022Article
- Quantitative MRI Harmonization to Maximize Clinical Impact: The RIN-Neuroimaging Network.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging towards clinical application in multiple sclerosis.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2021Review
- Prospective study of the association between sport-related concussion and brain morphometry (3T-MRI) in collegiate athletes: study from the NCAA-DoD CARE Consortium.British journal of sports medicine · 2021Article
- Longitudinal white-matter abnormalities in sports-related concussion: A diffusion MRI study.Neurology · 2020Article
- Traumatic microbleeds persist for up to five years following traumatic brain injury despite resolution of other acute findings on MRI.Brain injury · 2020Article
- Harmonization of Brain Diffusion MRI: Concepts and Methods.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Review
- Resting-State fMRI Metrics in Acute Sport-Related Concussion and Their Association with Clinical Recovery: A Study from the NCAA-DOD CARE Consortium.Journal of neurotrauma · 2020Article
- Reproducibility of axonal water fraction derived from the spherical mean diffusion weighted signal.Magnetic resonance imaging · 2019Article
- Cerebral blood flow in acute concussion: preliminary ASL findings from the NCAA-DoD CARE consortium.Brain imaging and behavior · 2019Article
- Structural neuroimaging in mild traumatic brain injury: A chronic effects of neurotrauma consortium study.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2019Observational
- Prevalence of Potentially Clinically Significant Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Athletes with and without Sport-Related Concussion.Journal of neurotrauma · 2019Article
- Reproducibility of Structural and Diffusion Tensor Imaging in the TACERN Multi-Center Study.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2019Article
- Acute White-Matter Abnormalities in Sports-Related Concussion: A Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study from the NCAA-DoD CARE Consortium.Journal of neurotrauma · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The NCAA-DoD Concussion Assessment, Research, and Education (CARE) consortium is performing a large-scale, comprehensive study of sport related concussions in college student-athletes and military service academy cadets. The CARE "Advanced Research Core" (ARC), is focused on executing a cutting-edge investigative protocol on a subset of the overall CARE athlete population. Here, we present the details of the CARE ARC MRI acquisition and processing protocol along with preliminary analyzes of within-subject, between-site, and between-subject stability across a variety of MRI biomarkers. Two experimental datasets were utilized for this analysis. First, two "human phantom" subjects were imaged multiple times at each of the four CARE ARC imaging sites, which utilize equipment from two imaging vendors. Additionally, a control cohort of healthy athletes participating in non-contact sports were enrolled in the study at each CARE ARC site and imaged at four time points. Multiple morphological image contrasts were acquired in each MRI exam; along with quantitative diffusion, functional, perfusion, and relaxometry imaging metrics. As expected, the imaging markers were found to have varying levels of stability throughout the brain. Importantly, between-subject variance was generally found to be greater than within-subject and between-site variance. These results lend support to the expectation that cross-site and cross-vendor advanced quantitative MRI metrics can be utilized to improve analytic power in assessing sensitive neurological variations; such as those effects hypothesized to occur in sports-related-concussion. This stability analysis provides a crucial foundation for further work utilizing this expansive dataset, which will ultimately be freely available through the Federal Interagency Traumatic Brain Injury Research Informatics System.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.