Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29063987›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2018

A decision support model to predict the presence of an acute infiltrate on chest radiograph.

O Zusman, L Farbman, M Elbaz, V Daitch, M Cohen, N Eliakim-Raz, T Babich, M Paul, L Leibovici, D Yahav

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

O ZusmanDepartment of Medicine E, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petach-Tikva, Israel. orenzusman@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9523-0834
L FarbmanDepartment of Medicine E, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petach-Tikva, Israel.
M ElbazDepartment of Medicine E, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petach-Tikva, Israel.
V DaitchDepartment of Medicine E, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petach-Tikva, Israel.
M CohenSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
N Eliakim-RazDepartment of Medicine E, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petach-Tikva, Israel.
T BabichDepartment of Medicine E, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petach-Tikva, Israel.
M PaulInfectious Diseases Unit, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
L LeiboviciDepartment of Medicine E, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petach-Tikva, Israel.
D YahavSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A chest infiltrate is needed to make a diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia, but chest X-rays might be time consuming, entail radiation exposure, and demand resources that are not always available. We sought to derive a model to predict whether a patient will have an infiltrate on chest X-ray (CXR). This prospective observational study included patients visiting the Emergency Department of Beilinson Hospital in the years 2003-2004 (derivation cohort) and 2010-2011 (validation cohort), who had undergone a CXR, and were suspected of having a respiratory infection. We excluded all patients with possible healthcare associated infections. A logistic regression model was derived and applied to the validation cohort. A total of 1,555 patients met inclusion criteria: 993 in the derivation cohort and 562 in the validation cohort with 287 (29%) and 226 (40%) having an infiltrate, respectively. The derivation model area-under-the curve (AUC) was 0.79 (95% CI 0.76-0.82). We categorized the patients into three groups-presence or absence of infiltrate, or undetermined. In the validation cohort, 70 (12%) patients were classified as 'no infiltrate'; 3 (4%) of them had an infiltrate, 367 (65%) were classified as 'infiltrate'; 190 (52%) of them had an infiltrate on CXR, and 125 (46%) were classified as 'undetermined'; 33 (26%) of them with an infiltrate on CXR. Using this prediction model for the evaluation of patients with suspected respiratory infection in an ED setting may help avoid over 10% of CXRs.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesAgedCommunity-Acquired InfectionsEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleNeutrophil InfiltrationPneumoniaProspective StudiesRadiography, ThoracicImagingPneumonia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.