Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29063953›Full record

ArticlePediatric cardiology2018

Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Safety and Indications in Pediatrics and Young Adults.

David M Biko, R Thomas Collins, Sara L Partington, Matthew Harris, Kevin K Whitehead, Marc S Keller, Mark A Fogel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance expert consensus statement on quantitative myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
    Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David M BikoDepartment of Radiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th and Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. bikod@email.chop.edu.
R Thomas CollinsDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Sara L PartingtonDivision of Cardiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Matthew HarrisDepartment of Radiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th and Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Kevin K WhiteheadDepartment of Radiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th and Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Marc S KellerDepartment of Radiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th and Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Mark A FogelDepartment of Radiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th and Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and indications for cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) in a cohort of children and young adults. A retrospective review of 178 children and young adults who underwent CMR with MPI was performed. Studies were categorized based on study protocols as MPI with resting perfusion only, adenosine stress MPI, exercise-induced stress MPI, and MPI for cardiac mass diagnosis. Relevant clinical history, exam indications, and adverse reactions following gadolinium-based contrast agent and adenosine administration were recorded. Studies were reviewed for the presence of myocardial perfusion defects, wall motion abnormalities, and delayed myocardial enhancement. The most common indications from MPI were congenital heart disease (CHD), Kawasaki disease, anomalous coronary artery, or myocardial mass characterization. Of these, 51% were protocoled with adenosine stress, 23% without stress, 6% with exercise stress, and 20% for cardiac mass evaluation. Excluding patients for myocardial mass evaluation, MPI defects were present in 16% (14 with adenosine stress, 1 with exercise stress, 8 on resting studies only). For cardiac mass evaluation, a mass was confirmed in 58%. No adverse reactions occurred with intravenous administration of a gadolinium-based contrast agent. Three self-limited adverse reactions, 2 patients with chest pain, and 1 patient with bradycardia, occurred following adenosine administration. MPI is a safe modality for the evaluation of pediatric and young adults with minimal adverse events. The most common indications for MPI were for the evaluation of CHD, Kawasaki disease, anomalous coronary artery, or myocardial mass characterization.

Indexed as

AdenosineAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolContrast MediaExercise TestFemaleHeart DiseasesHumansInfantMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMaleMyocardial Perfusion ImagingRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAdenosineContrast Media

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.