Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29063951›Full record

ReviewDer Pathologe2017

[Biliary tract cancers : Molecular characterization and identification of novel prognostic markers].

B Goeppert

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Pathologe, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

B GoeppertPathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 224, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland. benjamin.goeppert@uni-heidelberg.de.
University Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBile duct cancers (BTCs) are highly aggressive tumors with a dismal prognosis and an increasing incidence. BTC is a tumorbiologically and clinically heterogeneous tumor group and can be subdivided according to anatomical aspects into intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (iCCA), extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (eCCA) and gallbladder carcinomas (GBC). NEW THERAPY OPTIONS: Chronic inflammatory processes of the biliary system seem to play a role in the development of these tumors. Insights into molecular cholangiocarcinogenesis could make an important contribution to novel and more precise classification attempts and to the development of new, targeted therapies for BTC. EPIGENETIC AND GENETIC ALTERATIONS IN CHOLANGIOCARCINOMAS: The first description of genome-wide DNA methylation patterns in CCA showed drastic global methylation differences between CCA and corresponding non-neoplastic tissue (matched-pair analyses). Moreover, significant methylation differences between the CCA subtypes (eCCA and iCCA) could be found. Using immunohistochemistry and Sanger sequencing, it was shown that the actual BRAF V600E mutation rate seems to be significantly lower (1.3%) than previously described in the literature. IMMUNEPHENOTYPING IN BILIARY TRACT CANCERS: A comprehensive, subtype-specific characterization of tumor-infiltrating immune cells as well as an expression analysis of Major Histocompatibility Complex I was performed in a large and well-characterized BTC cohort. For further studies on the efficacy of immunomodulatory therapy approaches for BTC, the presented results provide a solid basis.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBiliary Tract NeoplasmsHumansPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorBile duct cancerCarcinogenesisCholangiocarcinomaGallbladderLiver neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID29063951
OpenAlexW2768322223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.