ArticleeLife2017
Two single-point mutations shift the ligand selectivity of a pheromone receptor between two closely related moth species.
Article in eLife, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Odorant receptor structures predict the major female sex pheromone component in a moth.BMC biology · 2026Article
- Molecular bases of insect odorant receptor function: specificity and evolution.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026Review
- Molecular evolution of CO2-sensing ab1C neurons underlies divergent sensory responses in the Drosophila suzukii species group.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Article
- Functional Characterization Supports Multiple Evolutionary Origins of Pheromone Receptors in Bark Beetles.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- A conserved pheromone receptor in the American and the Asian palm weevils is also activated by host plant volatiles.Current research in insect science · 2024Article
- Evolutionary shifts in pheromone receptors contribute to speciation in four Helicoverpa species.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2023Article
- A tale of two copies: Evolutionary trajectories of moth pheromone receptors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Heterologous investigation of metabotropic and ionotropic odorant receptors in ab3A neurons ofFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Article
- Review
- Single amino acid residue mediates reciprocal specificity in two mosquito odorant receptors.eLife · 2022Article
- Comparison and Functional Analysis of Odorant-Binding Proteins and Chemosensory Proteins in Two Closely Related Thrips Species,International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Mutagenesis of the odorant receptor co-receptor (Orco) reveals severe olfactory defects in the crop pest moth Helicoverpa armigera.BMC biology · 2022Article
- The Genetic Basis of Gene Expression Divergence in Antennae of Two Closely Related Moth Species,International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Protocol to identify ligands of odorant receptors using two-electrode voltage clamp combined with theSTAR protocols · 2022Article
- Functional olfactory evolution iniScience · 2022Article
- Review
- Molecular reconstruction of recurrent evolutionary switching in olfactory receptor specificity.eLife · 2021Article
- A single point mutation causes one-way alteration of pheromone receptor function in twoiScience · 2021Article
- Odorant Receptors for Detecting Flowering Plant Cues Are Functionally Conserved across Moths and Butterflies.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Male moths possess highly sensitive and selective olfactory systems that detect sex pheromones produced by their females. Pheromone receptors (PRs) play a key role in this process. The PR HassOr14b is found to be tuned to (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.