Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29063698›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2018

Exploring barriers and enablers for scaling up a community-based grain bank intervention for improved infant and young child feeding in Ethiopia: A qualitative process evaluation.

Binta Sako, Joanne N Leerlooijer, Azeb Lelisa, Abebe Hailemariam, Inge D Brouwer, Amal Tucker Brown, Saskia J M Osendarp

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Drivers of stunting reduction in Ethiopia: a country case study.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Binta SakoIndependent Consultant, Brussels, Belgium.
Joanne N LeerlooijerUniversity of Applied Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Azeb LelisaNutrition International, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Abebe HailemariamUNICEF, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Inge D BrouwerWageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Amal Tucker BrownUNICEF, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Saskia J M OsendarpWageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3847-5584
International Trachoma Initiative · ETNutrition International · CAOldham Council · GBUniversity of Applied Sciences Utrecht · NLWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Child malnutrition remains high in Ethiopia, and inadequate complementary feeding is a contributing factor. In this context, a community-based intervention was designed to provide locally made complementary food for children 6-23 months, using a bartering system, in four Ethiopian regions. After a pilot phase, the intervention was scaled up from 8 to 180 localities. We conducted a process evaluation to determine enablers and barriers for the scaling up of this intervention. Eight study sites were selected to perform 52 key informant interviews and 31 focus group discussions with purposely selected informants. For analysis, we used a framework describing six elements of successful scaling up: socio-political context, attributes of the intervention, attributes of the implementers, appropriate delivery strategy, the adopting community, and use of research to inform the scale-up process. A strong political will, alignment of the intervention with national priorities, and integration with the health care system were instrumental in the scaling up. The participatory approach in decision-making reinforced ownership at community level, and training about complementary feeding motivated mothers and women's groups to participate. However, the management of the complex intervention, limited human resources, and lack of incentives for female volunteers proved challenging. In the bartering model, the barter rate was accepted, but the bartering was hindered by unavailability of cereals and limited financial and material resources to contribute, threatening the project's sustainability. Scaling up strategies for nutrition interventions require sufficient time, thorough planning, and assessment of the community's capacity to contribute human, financial, and material resources.

Indexed as

Child Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAdolescentAdultChild Nutrition DisordersChild, PreschoolDietEthiopiaEvaluation Studies as TopicFemaleHumansInfantInfant FoodMaleMiddle AgedProgram Evaluationcomplementary feedingEthiopiainfant and childnutritionnutritional interventionsprocess evaluationscaling-up

Identifiers

PMID29063698
PMCPMC5901006
OpenAlexW2766664232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.