Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29063589›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2018

Endometrial carcinoma recurrence according to race and ethnicity: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group 210 Study.

A S Felix, T M Brasky, D E Cohn, D G Mutch, W T Creasman, P H Thaker, J L Walker, R G Moore, S B Lele, S R Guntupalli and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Single-nuclei sequencing of uterine serous carcinoma reveals racial differences in immune signaling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

A S FelixDivision of Epidemiology, Ohio State University College of Public Health, Columbus, OH.ORCID 0000-0001-8347-9018
T M BraskyDivision of Cancer Prevention and Control, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH.
D E CohnDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH.
D G MutchWashington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
W T CreasmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.
P H ThakerWashington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
J L WalkerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma, OK.
R G MooreProgram in Women's Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Infants Hospital/Brown University, Providence, RI.
S B LeleGynecologic Oncology [SBL] & NRG Statistics and Data Management Center [WD], Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY.
S R GuntupalliGynecologic Oncology, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, CO.
L S DownsGynecologic Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Ci NagelGynecologic Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.
J F BoggessGynecologic Oncology Program, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
M L PearlGynecologic Oncology, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY.
O B IoffeAnatomical Pathology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
W DengGynecologic Oncology [SBL] & NRG Statistics and Data Management Center [WD], Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY.
D S MillerDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
L A BrintonDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
The Ohio State University · USGynecologic Oncology Group · USWashington University in St. Louis · USBrown University · USCase Western Reserve University · USMedical University of South Carolina · USNational Institutes of Health · USState University of New York · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Oklahoma · US

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
Statistics CoreU10CA180822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI James J. Dignam · 2014 to 2026
$146.4M
NRG Oncology NCORP Research Base-BIQSFPUG1CA189867 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Deborah Watkins Bruner, Lisa A. Kachnic · 2014 to 2026
$140.5M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP HEADQUARTERSU10CA027469 · NCI · GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP · PI DISAIA, PHILIP J. · 1985 to 2013
$132.6M
Translational Therapeutics Research Program (TT)P30CA016058 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Tasleem J Padamsee · 1985 to 2026
$132.3M
Hormone-Related CancersZIACP010126 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI GIERACH, GRETCHEN · 2009 to 2025
$103.5M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP STATISTICAL OFFICEU10CA037517 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI BLESSING, JOHN A · 1985 to 2013
$67.4M
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUPU10CA101165 · NCI · GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP · PI DISAIA, PHILIP J. · 2003 to 2014
$43.1M
Washington University/ Siteman Cancer Center Lead Academic SiteU10CA180833 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BARTLETT, NANCY L, KOZOWER, BENJAMIN D · 2014 to 2018
$7.6M
Lead Academic Participating Site for the Development and Conduct of NCTN TrialsU10CA180798 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI MANNEL, ROBERT S., MOORE, KATHLEEN N. · 2014 to 2018
$6.7M
NCI National Clinical Trials Network - Lead Academic Participating SiteUG1CA233324 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI ANTHONY D ELIAS · 2019 to 2026
$5.2M
Network Lead Academic Participating Site Grant from the Roswell Cancer Inst.U10CA180866 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI ERNSTOFF, MARC S, LELE, SHASHIKANT · 2014 to 2018
$2.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016058NCI NIH HHS U10 CA027469NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037517NCI NIH HHS U10 CA101165NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180798NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180822NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180833NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180866NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189867NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233324
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-Hispanic black (NHB) women are more likely to experience an endometrial carcinoma (EC) recurrence compared to non-Hispanic white (NHW) women. The extent to which tumor characteristics, socioeconomic status (SES) and treatment contribute to this observation is not well defined. In the NRG Oncology/Gynecology Oncology Group (GOG) 210 Study we evaluated associations between race/ethnicity and EC recurrence according to tumor characteristics with adjustment for potential confounders. Our analysis included 3,199 NHW, 532 NHB and 232 Hispanic women with EC. Recurrence was documented during follow-up. We used Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between race/ethnicity and EC recurrence in models stratified by histologic subtype (low-grade endometrioid, high-grade endometrioid, serous, mixed cell, carcinosarcoma, clear cell) or stage (I, II, III) and adjusted for age, SES, body mass index, smoking status and treatment. In histologic subtype-stratified models, higher EC recurrence was noted in NHB women with low-grade endometrioid (HR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.21-3.10) or carcinosarcomas (HR = 1.66, 95% CI = 0.99-2.79) compared to NHWs. In stage-stratified models, higher EC recurrence was noted among NHB women with stage I (HR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.06-2.05) and Hispanic women with stage III disease (HR = 1.81, 95% CI = 1.11-2.95). Our observations of higher EC recurrence risk among NHB and Hispanic women, as compared to NHW women, were not explained by tumor characteristics, SES, treatment or other confounders. Other factors, such as racial differences in tumor biology or other patient factors, should be explored as contributors to racial disparities in EC recurrence.

Indexed as

AgedCarcinoma, EndometrioidCarcinosarcomaEndometrial NeoplasmsEthnicityFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth Status DisparitiesHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesSocial ClassTreatment Outcomeoutcomesracial disparitiessocioeconomic statustumor heterogeneityuterus neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID29063589
PMCPMC5798245
OpenAlexW2767070097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.