ReviewYearbook of medical informatics2017
Advances in Clinical Decision Support: Highlights of Practice and the Literature 2015-2016.
Review in Yearbook of medical informatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Factors influencing the implementation of decision support systems for antibiotic prescription in hospitals: a systematic review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Pooled it
- The Integration of Clinical Decision Support Systems Into Telemedicine for Patients With Multimorbidity in Primary Care Settings: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Clinical Decision Support for Glycemic Management Reduces Hospital Length of Stay.Diabetes care · 2022Article
- Stakeholder Perspectives on an Inpatient Hypoglycemia Informatics Alert: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR human factors · 2021Article
- Medical Specialists' Perspectives on the Influence of Electronic Medical Record Use on the Quality of Hospital Care: Semistructured Interview Study.JMIR human factors · 2021Article
- A thematic analysis to examine the feasibility of EHR-based clinical decision support for implementingJAMIA open · 2021Article
- Evaluation of ML-Based Clinical Decision Support Tool to Replace an Existing Tool in an Academic Health System: Lessons Learned.Journal of personalized medicine · 2020Article
- Artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support in modern medical physics: Selection, acceptance, commissioning, and quality assurance.Medical physics · 2020Review
- Supporting quality care for ESRD patients: the social worker can help address barriers to advance care planning.BMC nephrology · 2020Article
- Advances in Sharing Multi-sourced Health Data on Decision Support Science 2016-2017.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2018Review
- Contributions from the 2016 Literature on Clinical Decision Support.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.