ReviewYearbook of medical informatics2017
Update on Data Reuse in Health Care.
Review in Yearbook of medical informatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Factors Affecting the Quality of Person-Generated Wearable Device Data and Associated Challenges: Rapid Systematic Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2021Pooled it
- Leveraging Administrative Health Databases to Address Health Challenges in Farming Populations: Scoping Review and Bibliometric Analysis (1975-2024).JMIR public health and surveillance · 2025Article
- Beyond the numbers: the importance of contextual data when reusing blood pressure data from electronic health records.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- The Significance of Information Quality for the Secondary Use of the Information in the National Health Care Quality Registers in Finland.Methods of information in medicine · 2024Article
- Health data hubs: an analysis of existing data governance features for research.Health research policy and systems · 2023Article
- Automating Electronic Health Record Data Quality Assessment.Journal of medical systems · 2023Review
- Towards an Interoperable Ecosystem of Research Cohort and Real-world Data Catalogues Enabling Multi-center Studies.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2022Article
- Challenges using electronic nursing routine data for outcome analyses: A mixed methods study.International journal of nursing sciences · 2022Article
- Facing new challenges to informed consent processes in the context of translational research: the case in CARPEM consortium.BMC medical ethics · 2021Review
- National health information technology priorities for research: A policy and development agenda.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.