Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29063486›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in gastroenterology2017

Diagnosis and Management of Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms.

Malcolm Kearns, Nuzhat A Ahmad

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Multiparameter Analysis UsingContrast media & molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Malcolm KearnsDepartment of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Nuzhat A AhmadDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, PCAM 7 South, Philadelphia, PA, 1910, USA. nuzhat.ahmad@uphs.upenn.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementPancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs) are being diagnosed with increasing frequency. PCNs have diverse presentations, natural history, and biological behavior. Obtaining an accurate diagnosis of the type of cyst and assessing the potential for malignancy are crucial in determining the appropriate management strategy. Cross-sectional imaging with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), at experienced centers, is effective in defining the type of cyst as well as identifying high-risk features. Endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and cyst fluid analysis can categorize and risk-stratify cysts and is the test of choice in selected patients. However, there is currently no "perfect" test and studies have demonstrated substantial misdiagnosis and over-treatment of benign cysts using standard clinical, imaging, and cyst fluid analyses. Patients with symptomatic cysts or cysts with high-risk features suggestive of malignancy should be considered for surgical resection. Patients with low-risk PCNs can be placed in surveillance protocols with interval imaging. Various gastrointestinal societies have put forth evidence- or consensus-based guidelines that provide a framework for management of PCNs. However, the management can be complex and should ideally be planned in a multidisciplinary fashion by experienced specialists. Recent investigations using molecular markers to risk-stratify cysts offer promise in the future for an effective and accurate management strategy.

Indexed as

Endoscopic ultrasoundIntraductal papillary mucinous neoplasmsMucinous cystic neoplasmsPancreatic cystic lesionsPancreatic cystic neoplasmsPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.