Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29063478›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2018

Effects of Magnetic and Electric Field Uniformity on Coded Aperture Imaging Quality in a Cycloidal Mass Analyzer.

David M W Landry, William Kim, Jason J Amsden, Shane T Di Dona, Heeju Choi, Lori Haley, Zachary E Russell, Charles B Parker, Jeffrey T Glass, Michael E Gehm

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Clinical Chemistry for Developing Countries: Mass Spectrometry.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2021
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

David M W LandryDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
William KimDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Jason J AmsdenDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Shane T Di DonaDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Heeju ChoiElectron Energy Corporation, Landisville, PA, 17538, USA.
Lori HaleyElectron Energy Corporation, Landisville, PA, 17538, USA.
Zachary E RussellDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Charles B ParkerDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Jeffrey T GlassDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Michael E GehmDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA. michael.gehm@duke.edu.

Funding

Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy DE-AR0000546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cycloidal mass analyzers are unique sector mass analyzers as they exhibit perfect double focusing, making them ideal for incorporating spatial aperture coding, which can increase the throughput of a mass analyzer without affecting the resolving power. However, the focusing properties of the cycloidal mass analyzer depend on the uniformity of the electric and magnetic fields. In this paper, finite element simulation and charged particle tracing were used to investigate the effect of field uniformity on imaging performance of a cycloidal mass analyzer. For the magnetic field, we evaluate a new permanent magnet geometry by comparing it to a traditional geometry. Results indicate that creating an aperture image in a cycloidal mass spectrometer with the same FWHM as the slit requires less than 1% variation in magnetic field strength along the ion trajectories. The new magnet design, called the opposed dipole magnet, has less than 1% field variation over an area approximately 62 × 65 mm; nearly twice the area available in a traditional design of similar size and weight. This allows ion imaging across larger detector arrays without loss of resolving power. In addition, we compare the aperture imaging quality of a traditionally used cycloidal mass spectrometer electric design with a new optimized design with improved field uniformity. Graphical abstract ᅟ.

Indexed as

Aperture codingCycloidal mass analyzerElectric sectorMiniature mass spectrometerPermanent magnet

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.