ArticleIrish journal of medical science2018
Changing trends in postoperative cataract care: impact of electronic patient records in optometrist-delivered shared care.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study evaluates a community optometrist-delivered postoperative care scheme in patients discharged from the hospital ophthalmology department following uncomplicated cataract surgery.
aimThe aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of electronic patient records (EPR) in facilitating co-managed cataract care.
methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained Medisoft EPR database of postoperative cataract review data at a single centre, Sligo University Hospital (SUH), which serves a large and predominantly rural catchment area. All patients undergoing cataract surgery at SUH from October 2012 to September 2013 were included in this study. A total of 39 optometric practices, all with access to the Medisoft EPR software, participated in this pilot co-management scheme.
resultsOne thousand four hundred and twenty-two cataract surgeries were performed in SUH (55% female, 45% male); 1011 patients (71%) were discharged to the community on the day of cataract surgery. Complete postoperative feedback (i.e. data on refraction, visual acuity and intraocular pressure) was available in 97% of these patients compared to 50% of patients reviewed in the hospital. Patients followed up by optometrists were twice as likely to have complete postoperative clinical details (RR = 1.934, 95% CI: 1.759-2.126, p < 0.0001). Overall, 65% of operations were performed on first eyes. Hospital doctors were more likely to document requirement for second eye surgery compared to community optometrists (RR = 1.434, 95% CI: 1.302-1.580, p < 0.0001).
conclusionsOptometrists provided an excellent postoperative care service with superior postoperative feedback rates compared to hospital doctors. EPRs facilitate a postoperative shared-care pathway that is of high quality and efficiency with major economic advantages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.