Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29063348›Full record

ReviewJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2018

Differential contribution of microglia and monocytes in neurodegenerative diseases.

Caroline Baufeld, Elaine O'Loughlin, Narghes Calcagno, Charlotte Madore, Oleg Butovsky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Caroline BaufeldAnn Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Elaine O'LoughlinAnn Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Narghes CalcagnoAnn Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Charlotte MadoreAnn Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Oleg ButovskyAnn Romney Center for Neurologic Diseases, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. obutovsky@rics.bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0186-8867

Funding

Targeting TGFb/IFNy-IRF8 Signaling to Modulate Monocytes and their Crosstalk with Microglia and Astrocytes to Treat Multiple SclerosisR01NS088137 · NINDS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Oleg Butovsky · 2014 to 2026
$4.9M
Targeting the miR-155 and APOE-TREM2 pathways to restore dysfunctional microglia in Alzheimer’s diseaseR01AG054672 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BUTOVSKY, OLEG, IKEZU, TSUNEYA · 2017 to 2021
$4.1M
Microglial mechanisms of postoperative CNS inflammation and cognitive declineR01AG051812 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BUTOVSKY, OLEG, CROSBY, GREGORY · 2016 to 2020
$2.7M
Multiple Sclerosis Society 5092A1NIA NIH HHS R01 AG051812NIA NIH HHS R01AG051812NIA NIH HHS R01 AG054672NIA NIH HHS R01AG054672NINDS NIH HHS 1R01NS088137NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS088137
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroinflammation is a hallmark of neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Microglia, the innate immune cells of the CNS, are the first to react to pathological insults. However, multiple studies have also demonstrated an involvement of peripheral monocytes in several neurodegenerative diseases. Due to the different origins of these two cell types, it is important to distinguish their role and function in the development and progression of these diseases. In this review, we will summarize and discuss the current knowledge of the differential contributions of microglia and monocytes in the common neurodegenerative diseases AD, PD, and ALS, as well as multiple sclerosis, which is now regarded as a combination of inflammatory processes and neurodegeneration. Until recently, it has been challenging to differentiate microglia from monocytes, as there were no specific markers. Therefore, the recent identification of specific molecular signatures of both cell types will help to advance our understanding of their differential contribution in neurodegenerative diseases.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMicrogliaMonocytesNeurodegenerative DiseasesMicrogliaMonocytesNeurodegenerationNeuroinflammation

Identifiers

PMID29063348
PMCPMC7255107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.