ArticlePharmaceutical research2017
Microradiopharmaceutical for Metastatic Melanoma.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Atezolizumab-Conjugated Poly(lactic acid)/Poly(vinyl alcohol) Nanoparticles as Pharmaceutical Part Candidates for Radiopharmaceuticals.ACS omega · 2022Article
- Senescence and the Impact on Biodistribution of Different Nanosystems: the Discrepancy on Tissue Deposition of Graphene Quantum Dots, Polycaprolactone Nanoparticle and Magnetic Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles in Young and Elder Animals.Pharmaceutical research · 2020Article
- Molecular and Cellular Risk Assessment of Healthy Human Cells and Cancer Human Cells Exposed to Nanoparticles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Octreotide Nanoparticles Showed Affinity for In Vivo MIA Paca-2 Inducted Pancreas Ductal Adenocarcinoma Mimicking Pancreatic Polypeptide-Secreting Tumor of the Distal Pancreas (PPoma).Pharmaceutical research · 2019Article
- Decorated Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles with Monoclonal Antibody and Diethylene-Triamine-Pentaacetic Acid Labeled with Thechnetium-99m and Galium-68 for Breast Cancer Imaging.Pharmaceutical research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this article was to develop, characterize and test (in vivo) dacarbazine microparticles that may be labeled with 99mTc and Ra-223 for both use: diagnostic and therapy of metastatic melanoma.
methodsWe developed by double emulsion solvent evaporation methodology the microparticle. The characterization has been done using, Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The labeling with 99mTc and Ra-223 has been done by the direct labeling process. Also the formulation has been tested pre-clinically using Balb/c mice inducted with melanoma, performing the the biodistribution and planar imaging. Cytotoxicity evaluation was also done in M3 V cell line. In order to understand the safety aspects of the microparticles, microbiological study (endotoxin and sterility) has been done. Finally, planar imaging was performed to evaluate the diagnosing aspect.
resultsThe results showed that a 559 nm microparticles was obtained with a spherical shape. The labeling process with 99mTc reached over 90% of efficacy. On the other hand, the labeling process with Ra-223 showed a 70% efficacy. The results in inducted animals demonstrated that the microparticles were able to reach the tumor with a high rate (20%). Also demonstrated a low recognition by the Mononuclear Phagocytic System. The cytotoxicity and the microbiological control, corroborates the safety aspect of these microparticles.
conclusionThe planar image and the possible labeling with Ra-223, corroborates the use as a theragnostic agent for imaging and therapy of Metastatic Melanoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29063342What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.