Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29063268›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2018

Radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy reduce prostate cancer mortality in elderly patients: a population-based propensity score adjusted analysis.

Marco Bandini, Raisa S Pompe, Michele Marchioni, Zhe Tian, Giorgio Gandaglia, Nicola Fossati, Derya Tilki, Markus Graefen, Francesco Montorsi, Shahrokh F Shariat and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Spanish validation of Charlson index applied to prostate cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Marco BandiniDivision of Oncology/Unit of Urology URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, MI, Italy. marco.bandini.zoli@gmail.com.
Raisa S PompeCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Michele MarchioniCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Zhe TianCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Giorgio GandagliaDivision of Oncology/Unit of Urology URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, MI, Italy.
Nicola FossatiDivision of Oncology/Unit of Urology URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, MI, Italy.
Derya TilkiMartini Klinik, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Markus GraefenMartini Klinik, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Francesco MontorsiDivision of Oncology/Unit of Urology URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, MI, Italy.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Alberto BrigantiDivision of Oncology/Unit of Urology URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina 60, 20132, Milan, MI, Italy.
Fred SaadCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Pierre I KarakiewiczCancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · ITUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversität Hamburg · DEMartini-Klinik · DEMedical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeContemporary data regarding the effect of local treatment (LT) vs. non-local treatment (NLT) on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in elderly men with localized prostate cancer (PCa) are lacking. Hence, we evaluated CSM rates in a large population-based cohort of men with cT1-T2 PCa according to treatment type.

methodsWithin the SEER database (2004-2014), we identified 44,381 men ≥ 75 years with cT1-T2 PCa. Radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy patients were matched and the resulting cohort (LT) was subsequently matched with NLT patients. Cumulative incidence and competing risks regression (CRR) tested CSM according to treatment type. Analyses were repeated after Gleason grade group (GGG) stratification: I (3 + 3), II (3 + 4), III (4 + 3), IV (8), and V (9-10).

resultsOverall, 4715 (50.0%) and 4715 (50.0%) men, respectively, underwent NLT and LT. Five and 7-year CSM rates for, respectively, NLT vs. LT patients were 3.0 and 5.4% vs. 1.5 and 2.1% for GGG II, 4.5 and 7.2% vs. 2.5 and 2.8% for GGG III, 7.1 and 10.0% vs. 3.5 and 5.1% for GGG IV, and 20.0 and 26.5% vs. 5.4 and 9.3% for GGG V patients. Separate multivariable CRR also showed higher CSM rates in NLT patients with GGG II [hazard ratio (HR) 3.3], GGG III (HR 2.6), GGG IV (HR 2.4) and GGG V (HR 2.6), but not in GGG I patients (p = 0.5).

conclusionsDespite advanced age, LT provides clinically meaningful and statistically significant benefit relative to NLT. Such benefit was exclusively applied to GGG II to V but not to GGG I patients.

Indexed as

Propensity ScoreProstatectomyAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsSurvival RateNon-local treatmentPropensity scoreProstate CancerRadical prostatectomyRadiotherapySEER program

Identifiers

PMID29063268
OpenAlexW2766692177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.