ReviewDer Nervenarzt2017
[Childhood stroke : What are the special features of childhood stroke?]
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Arterial ischemic stroke in childhood and adolescence : Time-critical emergency in pediatrics].Der Nervenarzt · 2022Article
- [Stroke alarm-Arterial ischemic stroke as one of the most time-critical emergencies in children and adolescents].Der Nervenarzt · 2022Review
- Arterial ischemic stroke in infants, children, and adolescents: results of a Germany-wide surveillance study 2015-2017.Journal of neurology · 2019Article
- Childhood Stroke: Awareness, Interest, and Knowledge Among the Pediatric Community.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Childhood arterial ischemic stroke differs in essential aspects from adult stroke. It is rare, often relatively unknown among laypersons and physicians and the wide variety of age-specific differential diagnoses (stroke mimics) as well as less established care structures often lead to a considerable delay in the diagnosis of stroke. The possible treatment options in childhood are mostly off-label. Experiences in well-established acute treatment modalities in adult stroke, such as thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy are therefore limited in children and only based on case reports and case series. The etiological clarification is time-consuming due to the multitude of risk factors which must be considered. Identifying each child's individual risk profile is mandatory for acute treatment and secondary prevention strategies and has an influence on the individual outcome. In addition to the clinical neurological outcome the residual neurological effects of stroke on cognition and behavior are decisive for the integration of the child into its educational, later professional and social environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29063260What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.