ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2017
NMR relaxation parameters of methyl groups as a tool to map the interfaces of helix-helix interactions in membrane proteins.
Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Loop dynamics govern MALT1 activation revealed by integrative AlphaFold, MD, and NMR analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Insight into Malt1 activation mechanism through synergetic approach of AlphaFold, MD Simulation and NMR dynamic analyses.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Combined NMR and molecular dynamics conformational filter identifies unambiguously dynamic ensembles of Dengue protease NS2B/NS3pro.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Structural and Functional Insights into the Transmembrane Domain Association of Eph Receptors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In the case of soluble proteins, chemical shift mapping is used to identify the intermolecular interfaces when the NOE-based calculations of spatial structure of the molecular assembly are impossible or impracticable. However, the reliability of the membrane protein interface mapping based on chemical shifts or other relevant parameters was never assessed. In the present work, we investigate the predictive power of various NMR parameters that can be used for mapping of helix-helix interfaces in dimeric TM domains. These parameters are studied on a dataset containing three structures of helical dimers obtained for two different proteins in various membrane mimetics. We conclude that the amide chemical shifts have very little predictive value, while the methyl chemical shifts could be used to predict interfaces, though with great care. We suggest an approach based on conversion of the carbon NMR relaxation parameters of methyl groups into parameters of motion, and one of such values, the characteristic time of methyl rotation, appears to be a reliable sensor of interhelix contacts in transmembrane domains. The carbon NMR relaxation parameters of methyl groups can be measured accurately and with high sensitivity and resolution, making the proposed parameter a useful tool for investigation of protein-protein interfaces even in large membrane proteins. An approach to build the models of transmembrane dimers based on perturbations of methyl parameters and TMDOCK software is suggested.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.