ArticleEuropean radiology2018
Radiologist involvement is associated with reduced use of MRI in the acute period of low back pain in a non-elderly population.
Article in European radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Choosing Wisely Initiative and MRIs: Over- and Under-Diagnosis in Japan and Myanmar.Cureus · 2021Review
- Diagnostic Radiology Service in Japan.Japanese journal of radiology · 2018Article
- Global and Japanese regional variations in radiologist potential workload for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging examinations.Japanese journal of radiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo test the hypothesis that "acute-period" lumbar MRI in non-elderly patients with low back pain is less frequently performed at clinics/hospitals with greater involvement of full-time radiologists in the imaging workflow.
methodsIn a national-level claims database, we identified 14,819 non-elderly patients (mean age: 38.7±8.0 years) who visited clinics/hospitals for low back pain in 2013-2015. We classified the clinics/hospitals into four groups based on the level of full-time radiologist involvement and MRI ownership, and compared the frequency of acute-period lumbar MRI using hierarchical logistic regression analysis.
resultsPatients visiting facilities without a full-time radiologist (n=2105) were significantly (p<0.001) more likely to undergo acute-period MRI than those visiting facilities with ≥1 radiologist partially managing imaging workflow (level-1, n=491) or ≥1 radiologist intensively involved in imaging workflow (level-2, n=1190) (15.7% vs. 6.9% and 7.3%; adjusted odds ratio of no-radiologist versus level-2: 2.93, p=0.018). No difference was observed between level-1 and level-2 involvement.
conclusionsFacilities with no full-time radiologist were more likely to perform acute-period MRI to assess for low back pain, while no difference was seen between facilities with varying levels of radiologist involvement in the imaging workflow. Radiologist involvement may contribute to optimal utilisation of medical imaging. KEY POINTS: • Lumbar MRI was more frequently performed at facilities without full-time radiologists. • Full-time radiologists may play an important role in appropriate utilisation of imaging. • Frequency of MRI was similar between moderate and intensive radiologist involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.