Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29063229›Full record

ReviewNeurosurgical review2019

Interfacing with the nervous system: a review of current bioelectric technologies.

Ronald Sahyouni, Amin Mahmoodi, Jefferson W Chen, David T Chang, Omid Moshtaghi, Hamid R Djalilian, Harrison W Lin

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurosurgical review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ronald SahyouniDivision of Neurotology and Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of California, 108 Medical Sciences E, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Amin MahmoodiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, 108 Medical Sciences E, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Jefferson W ChenDivision of Neurotrauma, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, 108 Medical Sciences E, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
David T ChangDivision of Neurotology and Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of California, 108 Medical Sciences E, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Omid MoshtaghiDivision of Neurotology and Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of California, 108 Medical Sciences E, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Hamid R DjalilianDivision of Neurotology and Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of California, 108 Medical Sciences E, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA.
Harrison W LinDivision of Neurotology and Skull Base Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of California, 108 Medical Sciences E, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA. harrison.lin@uci.edu.
University of California, Irvine · USNeurological Surgery · USUniversity of California, Irvine Medical Center · US

Funding

University of California Health Participation in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR001414 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI COOPER, DAN M, VILAIN, ERIC J. · 2015 to 2023
$35.1M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001416 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI CAIOZZO, VINCENT JAMES, DEMETRIOU, MICHAEL · 2015 to 2023
$5.6M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001416NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to discuss the state of the art with regard to established or promising bioelectric therapies meant to alter or control neurologic function. We present recent reports on bioelectric technologies that interface with the nervous system at three potential sites-(1) the end organ, (2) the peripheral nervous system, and (3) the central nervous system-while exploring practical and clinical considerations. A literature search was executed on PubMed, IEEE, and Web of Science databases. A review of the current literature was conducted to examine functional and histomorphological effects of neuroprosthetic interfaces with a focus on end-organ, peripheral, and central nervous system interfaces. Innovations in bioelectric technologies are providing increasing selectivity in stimulating distinct nerve fiber populations in order to activate discrete muscles. Significant advances in electrode array design focus on increasing selectivity, stability, and functionality of implantable neuroprosthetics. The application of neuroprosthetics to paretic nerves or even directly stimulating or recording from the central nervous system holds great potential in advancing the field of nerve and tissue bioelectric engineering and contributing to clinical care. Although current physiotherapeutic and surgical treatments seek to restore function, structure, or comfort, they bear significant limitations in enabling cosmetic or functional recovery. Instead, the introduction of bioelectric technology may play a role in the restoration of function in patients with neurologic deficits.

Indexed as

Bioelectric Energy SourcesElectric Stimulation TherapyElectrodesHumansNervous System DiseasesProstheses and ImplantsBioelectric interfaceNerve implantNerve paresisNeural electrodeNeuroprostheticProsthetics

Identifiers

PMID29063229
PMCPMC5912997
OpenAlexW2765717193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.