Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29063219›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2018

Treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome due to rectocele and rectal intussusception with a high volume stapler (TST STARR-plus).

G Naldini, B Fabiani, C Menconi, I Giani, G Toniolo, D Mascagni, J Martellucci

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Tissue-Selecting Technique (TST36) for internal rectal prolapse: A tailored stapled transanal approach-A video vignette.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Staplers for obstructed defecation syndrome.Techniques in coloproctology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

G NaldiniProctological and Perineal Surgical Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Cisanello University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
B FabianiProctological and Perineal Surgical Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Cisanello University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
C MenconiProctological and Perineal Surgical Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Cisanello University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
I GianiProctological and Perineal Surgical Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Cisanello University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
G TonioloProctological and Perineal Surgical Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Cisanello University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
D MascagniDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
J MartellucciGeneral, Emergency and Minimally Invasive Surgery I, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy. jamjac64@hotmail.com.
Ospedale Cisanello · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, stapled transanal resection (STARR) has been adopted worldwide with convincing short-term results. However, due to the high recurrence rate and some major complications after STARR, there is still controversy about when the procedure is indicated. The aim of this study was to assess the safety, efficacy and feasibility of STARR performed with a new dedicated device for tailored transanal stapled surgery.

methodsAll the consecutive patients affected by obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) due to rectocele or/and rectal intussusception, who underwent STARR with the TST STARR-Plus stapler, were included in a prospective study. Pain, Cleveland Clinic Score for Constipation (CCCS) and incontinence, patient satisfaction, number of hemostatic stitches, operative time, hospital stay and perioperative complications were recorded. Postoperative complications and recurrence were also reported.

resultsForty-five consecutive patients (median age 50; range 24-79) were included in the study. Median resected volume was 15 cm

conclusionsTST STARR-Plus seems to be safe and effective for the treatment of ODS due to rectocele and rectal intussusception, and technical improvement could reduce the risk of some complications. However, careful patient selection is still the best means of preventing complications.

Indexed as

AdultAgedConstipationDefecationFemaleHumansIntestinal ObstructionIntussusceptionLength of StayMiddle AgedOperative TimePatient SatisfactionProspective StudiesRectal DiseasesRectoceleSurgical StaplersObstructed defecationRectal prolapseRectal resectionRectocele intussusceptionSTARRSurgical stapling

Identifiers

PMID29063219
OpenAlexW2765680340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.