Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29063046›Full record

ReviewChronic diseases and translational medicine2016

Circulating free DNA in the era of precision oncology: Pre- and post-analytical concerns.

Jun-Liang Lu, Zhi-Yong Liang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chronic diseases and translational medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Stance of MRD in Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma and its upsurge in the novel era of cell-free DNA.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jun-Liang LuDepartment of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China.
Zhi-Yong LiangDepartment of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNPeking Union Medical College Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer treatment has entered the era of precision medicine, where knowledge of a patient's genetic profile is used to facilitate early diagnosis, drug selection, prognosis, prediction of drug responsiveness, the onset of secondary resistance, and relapse. Circulating free DNA (cfDNA) has emerged as an ideal source of genetic information for cancer patients, and numerous studies have explored its validity in various clinical applications. However, clinical implementation of cfDNA-based tests has been slow. In this review, we addressed some of the pre- and post-analytical issues regarding cfDNA tests. First, we summarized the characteristics of cfDNA and reviewed the methods used to identify tumor-derived cfDNA from the pool of total cfDNA. Second, we described the procedures used to extract cfDNA, which have a great impact on representativeness and yield. Finally, we discussed our thoughts on the validation of cfDNA-based tests and the reporting of test results amid drastic limitations.

Indexed as

CharacterizationCirculating free DNAExtractionInterpretationValidation

Identifiers

PMID29063046
PMCPMC5643833
OpenAlexW2566035200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.