Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29062951›Full record

ReviewSynthetic and systems biotechnology2016

A brief overview of synthetic biology research programs and roadmap studies in the United States.

Tong Si, Huimin Zhao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Synthetic and systems biotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Synthetic biology in plants.Plant biotechnology (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Applications of synthetic biology in medical and pharmaceutical fields.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Synthetic biology in China, UK and US.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tong SiCarl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Huimin ZhaoCarl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.

Funding

Structural Elucidation and Biosynthesis P01GM077596 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI METCALF, WILLIAM W · 2007 to 2016
$15.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM077596
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The United States is a leading nation in the development of synthetic biology, an emerging engineering discipline to create, control and reprogram biological systems. With strategic investment from its government agencies, the U.S. has established numerous research centers and programs in synthetic biology, enabling significant advances in foundational tool development and practical applications ranging from bioenergy, biomanufacturing, to biomedicine. To maintain its leadership in synthetic biology, U.S, has conducted several roadmap studies to provide strategic visions and action recommendations. Here we will provide a brief overview of the major research programs and roadmap studies of synthetic biology in the U.S.

Identifiers

PMID29062951
PMCPMC5625737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.