Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29062933›Full record

ReviewSynthetic and systems biotechnology2016

Design, analysis and application of synthetic microbial consortia.

Xiaoqiang Jia, Chang Liu, Hao Song, Mingzhu Ding, Jin Du, Qian Ma, Yingjin Yuan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Synthetic and systems biotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Enhancing Gas Fermentation Efficiency via Bioaugmentation withBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Halophilic archaea as tools for bioremediation technologies.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaoqiang JiaKey Laboratory of Systems Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Collaborative Innovation Centre of Chemical Science and Engineering (Tianjin), Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.
Chang LiuKey Laboratory of Systems Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Collaborative Innovation Centre of Chemical Science and Engineering (Tianjin), Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.
Hao SongKey Laboratory of Systems Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Collaborative Innovation Centre of Chemical Science and Engineering (Tianjin), Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.
Mingzhu DingKey Laboratory of Systems Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Collaborative Innovation Centre of Chemical Science and Engineering (Tianjin), Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.
Jin DuKey Laboratory of Systems Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Collaborative Innovation Centre of Chemical Science and Engineering (Tianjin), Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.
Qian MaKey Laboratory of Systems Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Collaborative Innovation Centre of Chemical Science and Engineering (Tianjin), Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.
Yingjin YuanKey Laboratory of Systems Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Collaborative Innovation Centre of Chemical Science and Engineering (Tianjin), Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid development of synthetic biology has conferred almost perfect modification on single cells, and provided methodological support for synthesizing microbial consortia, which have a much wider application potential than synthetic single cells. Co-cultivating multiple cell populations with rational strategies based on interacting relationships within natural microbial consortia provides theoretical as well as experimental support for the successful obtaining of synthetic microbial consortia, promoting it into extensive research on both industrial applications in plenty of areas and also better understanding of natural microbial consortia. According to their composition complexity, synthetic microbial consortia are summarized in three aspects in this review and are discussed in principles of design and construction, insights and methods for analysis, and applications in energy, healthcare, etc.

Indexed as

Single/two/multiple speciesSynthetic microbial consortium

Identifiers

PMID29062933
PMCPMC5640696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.