Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29062613›Full record

ArticleExpert opinion on orphan drugs2017

Emerging and investigational therapies for neuroblastoma.

Mark A Applebaum, Ami V Desai, Julia L Glade Bender, Susan L Cohn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Expert opinion on orphan drugs, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The prognostic value ofCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine Profiles in Circulating Cell-Free DNA Associate with Disease Burden in Children with Neuroblastoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Genetic Predisposition to Neuroblastoma.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark A ApplebaumDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States of America.
Ami V DesaiDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States of America.
Julia L Glade BenderDepartment of Pediatrics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, 10032.
Susan L CohnDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States of America.
University of Chicago · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

Developing an Oncology Workforce for the 21st Century - Renewal 01K12CA139160 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI OLOPADE, OLUFUNMILAYO F., SMITH, SONALI · 2010 to 2024
$10.6M
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICST32GM007019 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Peter Hugh O'Donnell, MARK J RATAIN · 1985 to 2026
$8.7M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA139160NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTreatment for children with clinically aggressive, high-risk neuroblastoma remains challenging. Less than 50% of patients with high-risk neuroblastoma will survive long-term with current therapies, and survivors are at risk for serious treatment-related late toxicities. Here, we review new and evolving treatments that may ultimately improve outcome for children with high-risk neuroblastoma with decreased potential for late adverse events. AREAS COVERED: New strategies for treating high-risk neuroblastoma are reviewed including: radiotherapy, targeted cytotoxics, biologics, immunotherapy, and molecularly targeted agents. Recently completed and ongoing neuroblastoma clinical trials testing these novel treatments are highlighted. In addition, we discuss ongoing clinical trials designed to evaluate precision medicine approaches that target actionable somatic mutations and oncogenic cellular pathways. EXPERT OPINION: Advances in genomic medicine and molecular biology have led to the development of early phase studies testing biologically rational therapies targeting aberrantly activated cellular pathways. Because many of these drugs have a wider therapeutic index than standard chemotherapeutic agents, these treatments may be more effective and less toxic than current strategies. However, to effectively integrate these targeted strategies, robust predictive biomarkers must be developed that will identify patients who will benefit from these approaches and rapidly match treatments to patients at diagnosis.

Indexed as

genomic trialsimmunotherapyMIBGmolecularly targeted drugsNeuroblastoma

Identifiers

PMID29062613
PMCPMC5649635
OpenAlexW2594674790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.