ReviewSultan Qaboos University medical journal2017
Controversies in Odontogenic Tumours: Review.
Review in Sultan Qaboos University medical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differences of immunohistochemical profiling of MOC-31, caveolin-1, connexin-43, Ki-67 in ameloblastic fibroma, ameloblastic fibrodentinoma, ameloblastic fibro-odontoma, and odontomas.World journal of experimental medicine · 2026Article
- Correlation of Immunohistochemical Biomarkers and Differential Staining Techniques to Investigate the Role of Subepithelial Hyalinization in the Aggressiveness of Odontogenic Keratocyst.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024Article
- Subepithelial Hyalinisation Predicts Recurrence of Unicystic Ameloblastomas.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- CDC7 Expression in Selected Odontogenic Tumors.International journal of dentistry · 2022Article
- A multi-centre evaluation of malignant odontogenic tumours in Nigeria.The Pan African medical journal · 2019Article
- Clinical and histomorphometric evaluation of decompression followed by enucleation in the treatment of odontogenic keratocyst.Journal of dental sciences · 2018Article
- Re: Controversies in Odontogenic Tumours: Review.Sultan Qaboos University medical journal · 2018Article
- Hyalinization as a histomorphological risk predictor in oral pathological lesions.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Odontogenic tumours are lesions that occur solely within the oral cavity and are so named because of their origin from the odontogenic (i.e. tooth-forming) apparatus. Odontogenic tumours comprise a variety of lesions ranging from non-neoplastic tissue proliferations to benign or malignant neoplasms. However, controversies exist regarding the pathogenesis, categorisation and clinical and histological variations of these tumours. The recent 2017 World Health Organization classification of odontogenic tumours included new entities such as primordial odontogenic tumours, sclerosing odontogenic carcinomas and odontogenic carcinosarcomas, while eliminating several previously included entities like keratocystic odontogenic tumours and calcifying cystic odonogenic tumours. The aim of the present review article was to discuss controversies and recent concepts regarding odontogenic tumours so as to increase understanding of these lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.