Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29062533›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2017

The consultation of rugby players in co-developing a player health study: feasibility and consequences of sports participants as research partners.

Madeleine A M Davies, Edward Balai, Jo Adams, John-Henry Carter, Andrew Judge, Julia L Newton, Nigel K Arden

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Madeleine A M DaviesOxford NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Edward BalaiMedical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jo AdamsFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
John-Henry CarterOxford University Rugby Football Club, Oxford, UK.
Andrew JudgeOxford NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Julia L NewtonArthritis Research UK Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Nigel K ArdenOxford NIHR Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
University of Oxford · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBVersus Arthritis · GBNIHR Oxford Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

plain english summaryMany funding bodies within the United Kingdom and globally have encouraged public involvement in research. The Department of Health has also called public involvement a sign of good research. Despite the wide acceptance of public involvement improving many aspects of research, from its design to its communication, involvement has varied levels of implementation across different fields of research. Sports people have rarely been involved in research, partly as this research tends not to be funded by mainstream funding bodies. This may lead to a lower research quality, not founded in player ('service user') experiences. When creating a study of former rugby player health, we were very keen to involve rugby players, understand their thoughts on player health, and their playing experiences. This article explains how rugby players were involved in several ways, but mainly in group discussions during the design stage. These groups helped to inform our study's aims and questionnaire, ensure the questionnaire would capture player experiences and answer questions relevant to players, that they would like to understand after their participation in rugby. We found that these groups were easy to arrange, and that in only one session with each group, we were given many ideas of how to improve the questionnaire and study. We believe that other studies in sports should involve sports people, and that this is a useful activity that will change data collection forms and processes, improving the research, helping researchers, and making studies more suitable for players who take part in them. ABSTRACT:

Indexed as

ConsultationDesignHealthInvolvementPlayerPublicRugbyUser

Identifiers

PMID29062533
PMCPMC5611584
OpenAlexW2605060808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.