ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2017
Priority setting in research: user led mental health research.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Methodological procedures for priority setting mental health research: a systematic review summarising the methods, designs and frameworks involved with priority setting.Health research policy and systems · 2023Pooled it
- Views on mental health research in the context of schizophrenia: perspectives of peer support workers and researchers with lived experience - a qualitative study.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Genetics to Improve Outcomes in Schizophrenia (GENios): A within-case molecular genetic study protocol.PloS one · 2026Article
- The Coproduced Youth Priorities Project: Australian Youth Priorities for Mental Health and Substance Use Prevention Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Article
- What Should Personalised Mental Health Support Involve? Views of Young People with Lived Experience and Professionals from Eight Countries.Administration and policy in mental health · 2024Article
- A case study of using community-based consensus methods to facilitate shared decision-making among a spinal cord injury network.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2024Review
- Experience is central and connections matter: A Leximancer analysis of the research priorities of people with lived experience of mental health issues in Australia.PLOS mental health · 2024Article
- PERSPECTIVE: Economic and Policy Research Interests Highlighted in the 25th NIMH-Sponsored Mental Health Services Research Conference.The journal of mental health policy and economics · 2023Review
- What interventions should we implement in England's mental health services? The mental health implementation network (MHIN) mixed-methods approach to rapid prioritisation.Frontiers in health services · 2023Article
- Setting national research priorities for difficult-to-treat depression in the UK between 2021-2026.Journal of global health · 2022Article
- Defining research priorities for youth public mental health: reflections on a coproduction approach to transdisciplinary working.Health research policy and systems · 2022Article
- Mental Health Peer Worker Perspectives on Resources Developed from Lived Experience Research Findings: A Delphi Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- A Systematic Review of Patient Engagement Experiences in Brain Disorders.Patient related outcome measures · 2022Review
- Methods to Generate Innovative Research Ideas and Improve Patient and Public Involvement in Modern Epidemiological Research: Review, Patient Viewpoint, and Guidelines for Implementation of a Digital Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Review
- Translating Co-Design from Face-to-Face to Online: An Australian Primary Producer Project Conducted during COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Stakeholders' engagement in co-producing policy-relevant knowledge to facilitate employment for persons with developmental disabilities.Health research policy and systems · 2020Article
- Lessons learned from participatory research to enhance client participation in long-term care research: a multiple case study.Research involvement and engagement · 2020Article
- Engaging patients, clinicians, and the community in a Clinical Data Research Network: Lessons learned from the CAPriCORN CDRN.Learning health systems · 2019Article
- Is Co-production Just a Pipe Dream for Applied Health Research Commissioning? An Exploratory Literature Review.Frontiers in sociology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
plain english summaryInvolving people in health research is increasingly recognised as being important to make sure that research is focused more on the needs of people who use health services. At present, ideas about what should be researched most often comes from researchers and/or health professionals like doctors and nurses rather than people with a lived experience of mental illness. In this study, we will talk with this group of people from across Wales to explore what they think research into their health services should focus on. The findings from this work will help to influence the work of the National Centre for Mental Health Research Partnership Group; as well as` researchers and health professionals and others who concentrate on mental health research. The Research group is a partnership between people with a lived experience of mental ill health and professionals with an interest in mental ill health. The group plan to take forward the ideas that came from this research and some of the ideas have already been used to increase funding in the area of mental health research. ABSTRACT:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.