ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2016
Consumer and community involvement in health and medical research: evaluation by online survey of Australian training workshops for researchers.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Closing the Feedback Loop: Improving Communication of Findings With Aboriginal Research Participants Through Participatory Action Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Exploring staff and students' understanding and experience of Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) in an Irish University.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Who CaREs - We do: Development of a community and researcher engagement program in translational medicine.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Consumer Engagement in Chronic Conditions Research: An Integrated Framework Informed by Recognition Theory.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- From theory to practice in training health researchers in patient and public involvement: a scoping review protocol.Systematic reviews · 2025Article
- Partners, coordinators and high-level leaders' perspectives on a consumer and community involvement program in Australia: a qualitative evaluation using template analysis.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Facilitating consumer partnerships in health research.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Training and peer-group coaching for pairs of researchers and patient representatives to support continuous two-way learning.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- Embedding formal and experiential public and patient involvement training in a structured PhD programme: process and impact evaluation.Research involvement and engagement · 2023Article
- Developing a national strategy of consumer and community involvement (CCI) for women's health research.Research involvement and engagement · 2023Article
- Community engagement in kidney research: Guatemalan experience.BMC nephrology · 2022Article
- A framework for involving coproduction partners in research about young people with type 1 diabetes.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Article
- Evaluation of a patient and public involvement training programme for researchers at a large biomedical research centre in the UK.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Adolescent Participation in Research, Policies and Guidelines for Chronic Disease Prevention: A Scoping Review Protocol.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Preparing researchers for patient and public involvement in scientific research: Development of a hands-on learning approach through action research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018Article
- How embedded is public involvement in mainstream health research in England a decade after policy implementation? A realist evaluation.Journal of health services research & policy · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
plain english summaryIn Australia, since 2009, the Consumer and Community Involvement Program (formerly the Consumer and Community Participation Program) has developed and run workshops to help people working in health and medical research involve more consumers (patients) and community members (the public) in their research. In 2012, workshop attendees were invited to do an online survey to find out the effect, if any, that attending a workshop had on their awareness of and attitudes to consumer and community involvement. They were also asked about changes in their behaviour when it came to the involvement of consumers and the community in their work. The study found that, for people who answered the survey, more than double the number found consumer and community involvement very relevant after attending a workshop, compared with the number who thought that before attending one. Also, amongst those who answered the survey, 94 % thought that the workshop increased their understanding about involvement. ABSTRACT:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.