Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29062503›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2016

Older people's priorities in health and social care research and practice: a public engagement workshop.

Dalal Alsaeed, Nathan Davies, Julia Fiona-Maree Gilmartin, Elizabeth Jamieson, Kalpa Kharicha, Ann E M Liljas, Bahijja Tolulope Raimi-Abraham, Janine Aldridge, Felicity J Smith, Kate Walters and 1 more

Abstract readEditorial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. All you need is love: Yet another social determinant of health.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Recruiting Older Adults With Functional Difficulties Into a Community-Based Research Study: Approaches and Costs.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Dalal AlsaeedUniversity College London, School of Pharmacy, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London, WC1N 1AX, UK.
Nathan DaviesUniversity College London, Institute of Epidemiology & Health, Primary Care & Population Health, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
Julia Fiona-Maree GilmartinUniversity College London, School of Pharmacy, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London, WC1N 1AX, UK.
Elizabeth JamiesonUniversity College London, School of Pharmacy, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London, WC1N 1AX, UK.
Kalpa KharichaUniversity College London, Institute of Epidemiology & Health, Primary Care & Population Health, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
Ann E M LiljasUniversity College London, Institute of Epidemiology & Health, Primary Care & Population Health, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
Bahijja Tolulope Raimi-AbrahamUniversity College London, School of Pharmacy, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London, WC1N 1AX, UK.
Janine AldridgeAge UK London, Greater London Forum for Older People, 1st Floor, 21 St Georges Road, London, SE1 6ES, UK.
Felicity J SmithUniversity College London, School of Pharmacy, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London, WC1N 1AX, UK.
Kate WaltersUniversity College London, Institute of Epidemiology & Health, Primary Care & Population Health, Royal Free Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
Mine Orlu GulUniversity College London, School of Pharmacy, 29-39 Brunswick Square, London, WC1N 1AX, UK.

Funding

Department of Health HTA/12/192/10Medical Research Council G1001822
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

plain english summaryA one day public engagement workshop was held to focus on the priorities of older people about research and practice in health and social care. Seventy-five older people from the general public and a variety of backgrounds attended this event to share their views and discuss what should be prioritised. The main aim of this workshop was to identify and prioritise issues that are important to older people that would benefit from further research, as well as create an environment for older people to share ideas and problems related to these important issues. Key priorities brought up by participants included loneliness and isolation, support and training for professional and family carers, post-surgical care, negative perceptions of older people and inequalities related to public services and healthcare. Participants further suggested older people should be actively involved in all stages of the research process. ABSTRACT: As the world's population ages, there is an increasing need for research that addresses the priorities of older people. A public engagement workshop focusing on the priorities of older people for research and practice in health and social care was attended by seventy-five people aged 70 years and above in London, United Kingdom (UK). The workshop aimed to identify and prioritise issues important to older people that would benefit from further research and act as a platform to promote sharing of ideas and problems related to these important issues. Key priorities emerged including loneliness and isolation, support and training for professional and family carers, post-surgical care, negative perceptions of older people and inequalities related to public services and healthcare. Participants further suggested older people should be actively involved in all stages of the research process.

Indexed as

Age inequalityInvolvementOlder peoplePublic engagementResearch

Identifiers

PMID29062503
PMCPMC5611594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.